Helmet Disc Spring Force Absorbing Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional padding systems are ineffective in absorbing a wide range of impact forces, as they are designed for either high or low impact forces but not both, and once they deform to their load/deflection limit, they can no longer absorb forces exceeding this limit.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight, elastic shock-absorbing element comprising disc springs and an elastomeric component that can absorb and dissipate impact forces through a combination of disc springs with tailored geometries and materials, allowing for multi-stage load-deflection performance curves and high damping capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If conventional padding systems are designed for high impact forces, then they can absorb high impact forces, but they cannot effectively absorb low impact forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigh impact force absorptionVSAvoidlow impact force absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The force absorbing element is divided into multiple segments or layers with different material properties. Each segment is designed to activate at different force thresholds, allowing the system to handle both low and high impact forces effectively. The segmentation enables progressive engagement of different material layers based on the magnitude of the applied force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite materials with different mechanical properties combined in a single force absorbing element. This includes combining materials with different modulus of elasticity, yield strengths, and deformation characteristics to create a multi-stage response to impact forces. The composite structure allows simultaneous or sequential activation of different material properties based on force magnitude.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Force

If foam systems deform to their load/deflection limit, then they can absorb forces up to that limit, but they are no longer capable of absorbing forces which exceed this limit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce absorption up to load/deflection limitVSAvoidforce absorption capability beyond limit
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The force absorbing element incorporates dynamic characteristics through non-linear load-deflection behavior. The system transitions from a static foam structure to a dynamic response where stiffness and damping properties change with deformation level. This allows the element to remain effective across a wider range of force magnitudes by adapting its mechanical properties during the impact event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes material parameters such as modulus of elasticity, density, and damping coefficients across different regions or layers of the force absorbing element. This parameter variation enables the system to provide appropriate resistance at different deformation stages, maintaining reliability beyond the traditional load/deflection limit of uniform foam systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If disc springs are used to absorb impact forces, then high spring force and elasticity are achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring force and elasticityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges multiple disc springs into a stacked configuration where they work together as a single integrated unit. This combining approach maintains the high spring force and elasticity benefits of individual disc springs while reducing overall device complexity through compact stacking and shared mounting structures. The merged configuration also provides progressive force absorption as each spring engages in sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The disc springs are arranged in a nested or stacked configuration where smaller springs are positioned within or between larger springs. This nesting approach maximizes space utilization and provides multi-stage force absorption while maintaining a compact overall structure. The nested arrangement reduces the footprint and simplifies integration into the force absorbing element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides effective absorption of both high and low impact forces without permanent deformation, offering improved protection and energy dissipation across a range of applications, including sports equipment, by utilizing disc springs and elastomeric components to manage load-deflection profiles effectively.

Implementation Method 1

A lightweight, elastic shock-absorbing element comprising disc springs and an elastomeric component that can absorb and dissipate impact forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

allowing for multi-stage load-deflection performance curves and high damping capabilities

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS10350477B2Sports equipment that employ force-absorbing elements
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 COMPOSITE TECH CONCEPTS LLC
  • US10350477B2 patent drawing
  • US10350477B2 patent drawing
  • US10350477B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are directed towards a helmet adapted for use by a human being for a variety of activities. The helmet includes a shell, a plurality of FAEs, and at least one rigid component. The shell maybe configured and arranged to cover a portion of a wearer's head. The plurality of FAEs may be separately positioned adjacent to the shell's interior surface. Each FAE may include at least one disc spring that is adapted for absorbing forces. The at least one rigid component may be disposed within the shell and adjacent to the plurality of FAEs. In this way, the FAEs may be between the shell's interior surface and the at least one rigid component. When a force is applied to a location on the shell's exterior surface, it may be substantially absorbed by at least one of the FAEs positioned adjacent to the location on the shell's interior surface.