Protective Helmet Ventilation Guide Members

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing protective helmets, particularly for motorcycling, face challenges in achieving effective ventilation and demisting of the visor chamber due to turbulence and interference between air flows, leading to inefficient air circulation and potential misting issues.

Innovation Solution

The helmet employs physically separate ventilation paths and guiding members to isolate air flows intended for demisting and general ventilation, ensuring independent air circulation and minimizing turbulence, with guiding members creating a closed cross-section to direct air flows effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple air ports and channels are used for ventilation, then air circulation coverage is improved, but air flow control deteriorates leading to turbulence and chaotic flows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair circulation coverageVSAvoidair flow control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The ventilation system is divided into multiple independent circuits, each with its own dedicated air ports and channels. The first circuit handles general ventilation while the second circuit handles demisting, preventing interference between different air flow functions and maintaining laminar flow patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Guide members are introduced as intermediary structures to direct and control air flows within each circuit. These guide members ensure that air follows predetermined paths from air ports through channels to exit ports, preventing chaotic mixing and maintaining controlled laminar flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If air ports and channels are used for ventilation, then ventilation coverage is improved, but flow independence deteriorates causing interference between demisting and general ventilation flows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventilation coverageVSAvoidflow independence
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The ventilation system is segmented into functionally independent circuits. The first circuit is dedicated to general ventilation with its own air ports and channels, while the second circuit is dedicated to demisting with separate air ports, channels, and guide members, ensuring complete flow independence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the helmet are assigned different ventilation qualities and functions. The first circuit serves general ventilation needs in non-visor areas, while the second circuit provides specialized demisting function in the visor chamber, with each circuit optimized for its specific purpose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If shared air channels are used, then device complexity is reduced, but ventilation efficiency deteriorates due to turbulence and head losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventilation system structureVSAvoidventilation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The ventilation system uses separate channels for different functions. The first circuit has dedicated channels for general ventilation, while the second circuit has dedicated channels for demisting, eliminating turbulence from mixed flows and improving overall ventilation efficiency despite increased structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Guide members act as intermediaries within the second circuit to ensure smooth, controlled air flow from air ports through the visor chamber to exit ports. These guide members maintain laminar flow patterns that reduce head losses and improve demisting efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances ventilation efficiency and reduces turbulence, ensuring optimal air circulation and demisting within the helmet, maintaining clear visibility and comfort for the rider.

Implementation Method 1

guiding members which place an area of the helmet in fluid communication with a ventilation port for output of the air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid communication:

Implementation Method 2

these prevent a regular flow of air from the visor chamber towards the outlet ventilation port, with the risk of a head loss in the flows

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence reduction: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentEP3277116B1Protective helmet
Publication Date: 2021.01.27 DAINESE SPA
  • EP3277116B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3277116B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3277116B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A protective helmet (1) is described, said helmet comprising one or more air guiding members (20) configured to place in fluid communication at least one area of the helmet (22) with one or more ventilation ports (6) for output/expulsion of air so as to define an area intended for the passage of air flow independent from, and/or isolated, and/or not in fluid communication with, other areas intended for the passage of air flows in the helmet.