Helmet Impact Simulator with Translucent Skull for Brain Motion Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for testing the effectiveness of helmets in reducing head trauma do not account for the direct impact on the brain, lacking a simulated head model with a brain component to measure brain acceleration and trauma effectively.

Innovation Solution

A helmet impact simulator that includes a head model with a translucent cover for imaging, allowing for the analysis of brain motion factors such as velocity, acceleration, and deformation, and can be used with or without a helmet to evaluate the effectiveness of various helmets in preventing brain trauma.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional head impact test methods are used, then testing is simpler and less complex, but the ability to measure direct brain impact effects is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrain impact measurementVSAvoidtest apparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a scaled-down 1:6 life-size brain model that replicates the essential anatomical structures and mechanical properties of a human brain. This miniature copy enables precise measurement of brain impact effects while maintaining testability in a laboratory setting, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a translucent skull model as an intermediary that allows optical imaging systems to visualize and measure brain component motion during impact. This intermediary enables non-invasive measurement of internal brain dynamics without requiring direct intrusion into the brain tissue, thus maintaining measurement precision while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If a translucent skull model is used, then brain component motion can be visualized and measured, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrain motion visualizationVSAvoidhead model manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the optical parameter of the skull model by making it translucent rather than opaque, enabling visualization of brain component motion. This parameter change is achieved through material selection and manufacturing techniques that balance optical transparency with structural integrity, resolving the contradiction between measurement capability and manufacturing ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If high-speed imaging is used to capture brain motion, then detailed motion factors can be measured, but equipment complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion factor analysisVSAvoidimaging system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from direct physical measurement to optical imaging measurement by capturing brain component motion in the visual dimension. High-speed cameras record the motion of brain components through the translucent skull, and image analysis algorithms extract quantitative motion factors such as displacement, velocity, and acceleration, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the prediction of brain trauma by analyzing images of the brain component during impact, providing valuable data on the effectiveness of helmets in reducing brain acceleration and trauma through detailed motion factor analysis.

Implementation Method 1

a head model is configured with a translucent cover on the imaging side of the head model to enable a camera to take a plurality of images of the head model

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight transmission: Light

Data Source

PatentUS9552747B1Helmet impact simulator and method
Publication Date: 2017.01.24 PROTECTIVE SPORTS EQUIPMENT INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US9552747B1 patent drawing
  • US9552747B1 patent drawing
  • US9552747B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A head impact test apparatus is configured to enable viewing a head model including a brain component that may be at least partially surrounded by a fluid component and within a skull component. A head model may be a cross-sectional model of a person's head and have a translucent cover extending over the cross-sectional plane to enable viewing and image capture of the components of the head model. A camera may be configured to take a plurality of images during an impact test. These images may be analyzed to determine the acceleration and deformation of the brain component. An impact element is configured to impact the head model and the head model may have any type of helmet thereon. A helmet component may comprise a helmet cover. The test may be used to determine the effectiveness of helmets and helmet covers in reducing brain trauma.