Helmet Leaf Spring Impact Dissipation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current head protection equipment, such as helmets, fail to effectively mitigate the impact of routine hits in contact sports, leading to potential long-term brain injuries like chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), as they either increase axial loading forces or bulk up the helmet, making it unwieldy and interfering with athletic movements.

Innovation Solution

The use of leaf springs integrated into the helmet design to dissipate impact forces, providing a resilient and lightweight solution that increases the distance for force absorption and maintains the helmet's aesthetic appeal and usability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If soft-shell covers are used to cushion the head from impact, then the overall force of a hit is reduced, but axial loading forces increase and momentum transfers to the spinal cord

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall impact forceVSAvoidaxial loading forces
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from soft/compliant to hard/rigid for the helmet shell. This rigid shell prevents the shell from giving in on impact, thereby maintaining the ability to glance off impacts rather than transferring momentum to the spinal cord, while still protecting against axial loading forces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials combining a rigid outer shell with an inner cushioning system. The rigid shell (polycarbonate, polyethylene, or composite materials) provides structural integrity and glancing capability, while the inner cushioning material absorbs impact forces without increasing axial loading

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Force

If shock strips are added as cushions to impacts, then impact cushioning is provided, but the glancing effect of helmets is reduced and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact cushioningVSAvoidhelmet structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the cushioning function directly into the helmet shell structure itself. The cushioning material is integrated within the shell or as an inner liner, eliminating the need for separate shock strips attachments. This integration maintains the glancing effect while providing impact cushioning, and reduces device complexity by combining multiple functions into a unified structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The helmet shell is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: providing structural integrity, enabling glancing off impacts, and cushioning impact forces. The integrated cushioning system serves both protective and structural roles, reducing the need for additional separate components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Force

If thicker cushioning layers are added to reduce impact force, then force absorption is improved, but helmet bulk increases and interferes with athletic movements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce absorptionVSAvoidhelmet bulk
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses thin film or layer cushioning materials that provide effective force absorption without adding significant bulk. The cushioning layers are designed to be thin yet highly effective at dissipating impact forces through their material properties rather than thickness, maintaining helmet sleekness and athletic mobility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the density and material properties of the cushioning layers rather than increasing thickness. By using materials with optimized density and energy absorption characteristics, the helmet achieves effective force absorption with minimal added volume, preventing interference with athletic movements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The leaf spring system effectively reduces the impact force on the head by increasing the distance for force absorption, minimizing the risk of long-term brain injuries while maintaining the helmet's functionality and comfort during athletic activities.

Implementation Method 1

a leaf spring coupled with the shell portion and configured to dissipate forces on the shell portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10881162B2Device for minimizing impact of collisions for a helmet
Publication Date: 2021.01.05 EXERO LABS LLC
  • US10881162B2 patent drawing
  • US10881162B2 patent drawing
  • US10881162B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for fixing to a helmet is described. The helmet includes a shell portion configured to receive a user's head, and the device includes a leaf spring for coupling to the shell portion and configured to dissipate impact forces. A helmet including such device is further described.