Cycling Helmet Liner Coupling for Rotational Impact Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional helmets suffer from instability due to rotating energy management liners that can separate during impacts, compromising protection, and branding elements often detach, reducing effectiveness and stability.

Innovation Solution

A cycling helmet design featuring an inner and outer liner coupled by elastomeric return springs and leash couplings, with a branding element integrated into the shell, allowing for rotational energy attenuation and maintaining liner stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional helmets use structures that require breaking or deforming material for liners to rotate against each other, then energy absorption is achieved, but helmet stability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorptionVSAvoidhelmet stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the mechanical properties of the coupling mechanism from rigid breaking/deforming connections to elastic returnable connections. The return springs provide a reversible elastic deformation mechanism that absorbs energy while maintaining structural integrity and stability, resolving the contradiction between energy absorption and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite coupling system combining return springs (elastic material) with rigid liner structures. This composite approach allows the elastic springs to absorb energy through reversible deformation while the rigid liners maintain structural stability, achieving both energy absorption and stability simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Loss of energy

If liners are allowed to rotate against each other for energy absorption, then impact energy is managed, but complete separation of liners occurs reducing protection effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy managementVSAvoidprotection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The return springs are pre-installed between the liners to provide cushioning and maintain connection. This beforehand preparation ensures that during impact, the liners can rotate for energy absorption while the springs prevent complete separation, maintaining protection effectiveness throughout the incident.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The return springs act as intermediary elements between the inner and outer liners. They mediate the interaction by allowing controlled rotation for energy absorption while simultaneously preventing complete separation, thus maintaining the protective function of the helmet system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If branding elements are attached to the outer shell with adhesive, then brand communication is achieved, but elements detach during impact compromising branding and potentially reducing protection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebranding applicationVSAvoidbranding integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The return springs are installed beforehand to cushion and stabilize the helmet structure during impacts. This pre-positioned cushioning prevents the kind of structural failure that would cause branding elements to detach, maintaining both branding integrity and protection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The return springs provide preliminary anti-action by counteracting the forces that would otherwise cause liner separation and potential branding element detachment. This preemptive stabilization ensures branding remains intact while maintaining protection during impact events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively attenuates rotational energy while preventing complete separation of liners, enhancing stability and maintaining branding integrity during impacts.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of return springs comprising an elastomeric material, each return spring having a first end coupled to the inward-facing surface of the outer liner, a second end distal to the first end and coupled to the outward-facing surface of the inner liner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The design effectively attenuates rotational energy while preventing complete separation of liners, enhancing stability and maintaining branding integrity during impacts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy attenuation: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS12575630B2Cycling helmet with rotational impact attenuation
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 BELL SPORTS INC
  • US12575630B2 patent drawing
  • US12575630B2 patent drawing
  • US12575630B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A helmet having an outer liner with an inward-facing surface, an inner liner with an outward-facing surface that interfaces with the inward-facing surface of the outer liner, and a flexible tether coupling the outer liner to the inner. The inner liner is slidably coupled to the outer liner via a plurality of return springs, the plurality of return springs biasing the inner liner to a first position with respect to the outer liner.