Customized Helmet Lining for Optronic Device Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing helmet inner linings with foam shims do not allow precise adjustment of optronic devices and can cause discomfort due to poor fit, while customized helmets are expensive and wasteful to manufacture.

Innovation Solution

A method to create a customized lining for standard helmets using 3D scanning to measure user and helmet dimensions, defining a flexible cellular structure with varying densities and patterns to ensure precise optronic device positioning and comfort, manufactured using additive methods to reduce waste and time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a standard helmet with foam shims is used, then the helmet can be manufactured quickly and cheaply, but the optronic device positioning is imprecise and requires readjustment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing speedVSAvoidoptronic device positioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The inner lining is divided into multiple separate foam portions (first portion, second portion, third portion) that can be individually manufactured and then assembled. This segmentation allows each portion to be precisely shaped for specific head zones while maintaining efficient manufacturing processes for each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the lining have different cellular densities tailored to specific zones of the head. The first portion has a first cellular density, the second portion has a second cellular density, and the third portion has a third cellular density, allowing optimized comfort and positioning for different anatomical regions while achieving precise overall fit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If a customized helmet is manufactured by moulding or machining, then the helmet fits the user's head precisely, but the manufacturing process is expensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehelmet fit precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The method uses 3D scanning to capture the user's head geometry and helmet interior geometry in advance, then processes these measurements to generate a customized lining design before manufacturing. This preliminary digital modeling allows precise customization without the time-consuming traditional moulding or machining processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The lining portions are manufactured with specific cellular densities as a key parameter - the first portion has a first cellular density, the second portion has a second cellular density, and the third portion has a third cellular density. This parameter variation allows customization of both fit and comfort properties through additive manufacturing rather than traditional subtractive methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional foam shims are used for adjustment, then the lining can be manufactured simply, but the optronic device position cannot be precisely adjusted and causes discomfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelining manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidoptronic device positioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The lining is segmented into multiple portions that can be manufactured using additive manufacturing processes, which are relatively simple and efficient. Each portion is designed with specific geometries and cellular structures that enable precise positioning when assembled together, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and positioning precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each lining portion is designed with locally optimized properties including specific cellular densities and thicknesses tailored to different head zones. This local quality variation enables precise optronic device positioning and comfort optimization while maintaining ease of manufacture through modern additive processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If customized helmets are manufactured, then the helmet is adapted to the user's head shape, but significant waste is generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehelmet adaptation to user headVSAvoidmanufacturing waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The lining portions are manufactured using additive manufacturing with controlled cellular density parameters. This approach creates customized components with precise material placement, significantly reducing waste compared to traditional subtractive manufacturing methods while maintaining full adaptability to the user's head shape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The lining uses foam materials with controlled cellular structures that can be manufactured additively. This composite approach combines the adaptability of customized fit with the efficiency of additive manufacturing, minimizing material waste while achieving precise head adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS12185785B2Method for fitting a helmet to the head of a user
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 THALES SA
  • US12185785B2 patent drawing
  • US12185785B2 patent drawing
  • US12185785B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for fitting a pre-existing standard helmet to the head of a user, the helmet includes an optronic device intended to be positioned in front of the eyes of the user, the method comprising: A) measuring the dimensions of the user's head, the dimensions of the head comprising a volume of the head and a position of the eyes, B) obtaining the dimensions of the helmet, the dimensions of the helmet including a volume of the helmet, C) defining a lining for the helmet so as to ensure the positioning of the optronic device in front of the user's eyes, the lining having a top face that is intended to be applied against an inner face of the helmet and a bottom face that is intended to be applied against the user's head, the lining having a flexible cellular structure, the manufacture of the lining being adapted to the dimensions of the head and to the dimensions of the helmet, D) manufacturing the lining as defined in step C), and E) placing the lining inside the helmet.