Custom Helmet Mesostructure With Thickness Gradient for Impact Fit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing helmets do not conform to the anthropometric aspects of individuals' heads, leading to issues with fit, comfort, and stability, which compromises their protective effectiveness during impacts.

Innovation Solution

A custom-designed mesostructure helmet that conforms to the user's head shape, featuring a thickness gradient and can be combined with an outer shell, formed using additive manufacturing, to enhance fit, comfort, and stability, thereby improving impact protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a standardized helmet design is used, then manufacturing cost and complexity are reduced, but fit and comfort for individual users deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidfit and comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a helmet with spatially varying thickness - the shell is thinner in some regions and thicker in others, optimized for each specific location's impact protection needs while maintaining overall lightweight design. This localized optimization enables both manufacturing efficiency and superior individualized fit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by varying the thickness parameter of the helmet shell across different spatial locations. The thickness transitions smoothly between regions, allowing the same manufacturing process to produce customized fit characteristics for individual users while maintaining structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If a uniform thickness helmet shell is used, then manufacturing is simpler, but impact protection effectiveness deteriorates due to inability to optimize for different impact zones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidimpact protection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The helmet shell features local quality through spatially varying thickness, where critical impact zones have greater thickness for enhanced protection while non-critical areas are thinner to reduce overall weight. This localized optimization improves impact protection effectiveness without complicating the manufacturing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces thickness variation as an additional design dimension, transitioning from a uniform 2D shell to a 3D variable-thickness structure. This dimensional enhancement allows optimization of impact protection across different zones while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through continuous surface geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If a thicker helmet shell is used throughout, then impact protection is improved, but weight and comfort deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact protectionVSAvoidhelmet weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The helmet implements local quality by providing greater thickness only where impact protection is most needed, while maintaining thinner sections in areas with lower impact risk. This localized thickening achieves superior protection at critical zones without proportionally increasing overall helmet weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by providing enhanced thickness only in specific regions rather than uniformly throughout the entire shell. This selective thickening delivers adequate protection where required while minimizing unnecessary material and weight in non-critical areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Ease of operation

If a customized helmet design is used, then fit and comfort are improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefit and comfortVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves universality by creating a single customized shell design that serves multiple functions: it provides personalized fit through contoured geometry, delivers optimized impact protection through variable thickness, and maintains manufacturing efficiency through continuous surface formation. This multi-functional design reduces the need for additional components or assembly steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mesostructure provides improved fit and comfort, increasing the likelihood of proper helmet wear and enhancing impact protection by distributing load and reducing peak linear and rotational acceleration.

Implementation Method 1

The mesostructure can be designed to include a thickness gradient extending from an inner periphery to an outer periphery of the mesostructure, to reduce peak linear acceleration during an impact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force distribution: Impact Force

Implementation Method 2

forming the mesostructure using an additive manufacturing technique such as, for instance, three-dimensional (3D) printing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdditive manufacturing: 3D Printing

Data Source

PatentUS20250302138A1Mesostructures and process for helmet fit
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 VIRGINIA TECH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES INC
  • US20250302138A1 patent drawing
  • US20250302138A1 patent drawing
  • US20250302138A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A custom-formed mesostructure for a helmet and process for designing the mesostructure are described. In one example, a process for designing a helmet for an individual can include generating a model of anthropometric aspects of a head of the individual using a scanning technique. The process can further include editing the model to generate a refined model of the anthropometric aspects of the head. The process can further include designing a mesostructure based on the refined model. The process can also include designing the mesostructure as a latticed structure having a thickness gradient that is relatively thinner along an inner periphery of the mesostructure and thicker along an outer periphery of the mesostructure, to reduce peak linear acceleration during an impact. The process can also include forming the mesostructure using an additive manufacturing technique. The mesostructure can be used independently as a helmet or combined with an outer shell.