Helmet Reactive Layer with Rolling Balls for Oblique Impact Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Helmets currently fail to provide adequate protection against oblique impacts, which can result in rotational acceleration of the brain, leading to injuries such as subdural hematomas and diffuse axonal injuries due to the inability to effectively mitigate tangential forces.

Innovation Solution

A helmet design featuring a reactive layer with rigid balls sandwiched between stiff outer and inner layers, allowing the balls to roll upon impact, thereby reducing rotational forces and absorbing energy to minimize brain and neck injuries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a helmet comprises only traditional impact absorbing layers, then linear impact forces are reduced, but tangential forces during oblique impacts are not adequately mitigated, resulting in rotational acceleration of the brain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational acceleration of the brainVSAvoidprotection against oblique impacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a reactive layer containing movable elements (balls or capsules) that can dynamically reposition themselves during impact. These elements shift from a static configuration to an active rolling motion when subjected to tangential forces, enabling the helmet to adapt its protective mechanism based on the impact type and direction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The reactive layer acts as an intermediary between the outer shell and the inner comfort layer. This intermediate layer with movable elements provides a mechanical interface that specifically addresses tangential forces by allowing controlled rolling motion, thereby reducing rotational acceleration transmitted to the brain while maintaining structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If the helmet structure is made stiffer to reduce deformation during impact, then protection against linear impacts improves, but the ability to absorb and dissipate tangential energy through deformation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against linear impactsVSAvoiddissipation of tangential energy
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The helmet is divided into distinct functional layers: a rigid outer shell for structural strength, a reactive layer with movable elements for energy dissipation, and an inner comfort layer. This segmentation allows each layer to specialize in specific protective functions, with the reactive layer's movable elements providing energy dissipation through rolling motion without compromising the overall structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reactive layer utilizes elements with specific physical parameters (size, material properties, distribution density) that can be optimized to control the threshold and characteristics of rolling motion. By adjusting these parameters, the helmet can be tuned to activate the energy dissipation mechanism at appropriate impact levels while maintaining stiffness for linear impact protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The helmet effectively reduces the transmission of tangential forces to the brain, lowering the risk of severe injuries by facilitating the rolling of balls between layers, which helps in distributing and reducing the impact force, thus enhancing safety during oblique impacts.

Implementation Method 1

the reactive layer comprises a plurality of rigid balls, that particularly remain rigid during normal use of the helmet and are configured to roll at an impact threshold over an outer surface of the second layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling: Roller

Implementation Method 2

absorbing energy to minimize brain and neck injuries

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS20240315373A1Functional reactive layer helmet
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 HEXR LTD
  • US20240315373A1 patent drawing
  • US20240315373A1 patent drawing
  • US20240315373A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a helmet (1) comprising: a first layer (10) forming an outer surface of the helmet (1), a second layer (30), and a reactive layer (20) sandwiched between the first layer (10) and the second layer (30), whereby said reactive layer (20) comprises a plurality of rigid balls (2) allowing the first layer (10) to roll upon the second layer (30) as soon as the helmet (1) undergoes an impact of an intensity greater than a predetermined threshold.