Football Helmet Shell Recesses for Lower Weight and Less Snagging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing football helmets are heavy and cause user fatigue due to increased thickness for impact resistance, and they may snag on other players or equipment during use.

Innovation Solution

A football helmet design with a shell that includes recessed areas for the chin strap, front bumper, and facemask, along with a liner and pads of varying thickness and detachable coupling, to reduce weight and improve comfort by lowering the center of gravity and allowing localized flexing to absorb impact forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the shell thickness is increased to improve impact resistance, then safety is improved, but weight increases causing user fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidhelmet weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The shell is divided into multiple zones with different thicknesses (thicker portions at front and rear, thinner portions at sides), allowing impact resistance where needed while reducing weight overall. The liner is also segmented into multiple layers with different densities and thicknesses to provide graduated protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The helmet uses composite construction combining a shell material (such as polycarbonate or ABS plastic) with a liner material (such as foam or honeycomb structure). This composite approach provides impact resistance through material properties rather than solely through thickness, improving safety while controlling weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If protruding elements are added to improve protection, then safety is improved, but the helmet may snag on other players or equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprotectionVSAvoidsnagging
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The shell features localized thicker portions at the front and rear where impact is most likely to occur, while maintaining smoother, thinner portions at the sides to minimize snagging. The chin strap and facemask are positioned in recessed areas rather than protruding outward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The chin strap and facemask are positioned in recessed areas of the shell rather than extending outward, effectively moving these protective elements into a different spatial dimension relative to the shell surface, thereby eliminating snagging while maintaining protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If the helmet structure is made more complex to improve protection, then safety is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The helmet is divided into separate modular components (shell, liner, facemask, chin strap) that can be manufactured independently using standard processes and then assembled. This segmentation simplifies manufacturing of individual parts while allowing complex overall protection through assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The liner is constructed as a flexible multi-layer structure that can be formed into the desired protective configuration through molding rather than complex assembly. This flexible construction approach simplifies manufacturing compared to rigid multi-component assembly while providing adequate protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The helmet reduces user fatigue and minimizes snagging while meeting or exceeding safety certification standards for impact resistance and comfort, enhancing performance in impact tests.

Implementation Method 1

allowing localized flexing to absorb impact forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

absorb impact forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 3

lowering the center of gravity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS20250344797A1helmet
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 RIDDELL INC
  • US20250344797A1 patent drawing
  • US20250344797A1 patent drawing
  • US20250344797A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A helmet may include a shell defining a cavity to receive a user's head. The shell may include a shell outer surface and a receiving area recessed into the shell outer surface. A liner may be within the cavity and coupled to the shell. A facemask may be coupled to the shell. A front bumper may be coupled to the shell and the liner. The front bumper may extend from within the cavity to an exterior of the shell. The front bumper may be positioned at least partially within the receiving area of the shell.