Helmet Shock Absorbing Insert Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Helmets often face a trade-off between providing adequate protection, being lightweight, well-ventilated, affordable, and aesthetically pleasing, as these criteria tend to compete with each other, making it challenging to balance competing factors in helmet design.

Innovation Solution

A helmet design featuring a shell with a shock-absorbing liner and inserts made from materials like honeycomb, which are deformable to fit within cavities in the liner, providing both impact absorption and ventilation, while being securely retained without adhesives, allowing for seamless construction and improved structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a helmet is designed with a harder shell material to provide greater protection, then impact resistance is improved, but the helmet becomes heavier

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidhelmet weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials combining a harder outer shell material with a softer inner liner material. The shell provides impact resistance while the liner provides shock absorption, achieving protection without requiring the entire helmet to be made of heavy hard material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different material properties to different parts of the helmet - a harder material for the outer shell where impact resistance is needed, and a softer material for the inner liner where shock absorption is needed. This localized material selection optimizes both protection and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Use of energy by moving object

If a helmet is designed with more ventilation cavities to improve airflow, then ventilation is improved, but impact coverage is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveventilationVSAvoidimpact coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions ventilation cavities in specific locations on the helmet shell where they provide airflow while minimizing impact coverage reduction. The cavities are strategically placed to maintain protection in critical impact zones while enabling ventilation in less critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Weight of moving object

If a helmet is designed to be light in weight and well-ventilated, then comfort is improved, but impact resistance is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehelmet weightVSAvoidimpact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines lighter materials (softer liner material and strategic cavity placement) with targeted protection zones, achieving weight reduction and ventilation while maintaining impact resistance through the composite structure and strategic material placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If a helmet provides good head protection and is light in weight, then performance is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead protectionVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the helmet into separate components - an outer shell and an inner liner - that can be manufactured independently and then assembled. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized and manufactured separately, reducing overall manufacturing complexity while maintaining protection performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design balances protection, weight, ventilation, and manufacturability, offering enhanced shock absorption and ventilation while maintaining structural strength and aesthetic appeal, addressing the competing criteria in helmet design.

Implementation Method 1

the insert is constructed of a shock absorbing material (e.g., a honeycomb material) and has a shape relative to a shape of a cavity (or cavities) in the first shock absorbing material such that the insert is required to be deformed in order to be removed from the cavity (or cavities) in the first shock absorbing material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20240099413A1Helmet with shock absorbing inserts
Publication Date: 2024.03.28 SMITH SPORT OPTICS INC
  • US20240099413A1 patent drawing
  • US20240099413A1 patent drawing
  • US20240099413A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Helmets and methods for manufacturing a helmet are described. An example helmet includes a shell and a shock absorbing liner attached to the shell. The shock absorbing liner includes a cavity. The helmet a shock absorbing insert formed of a material different than the material of the shock absorbing liner. The cavity is configured to retain the shock absorbing insert.