Helmet Subliner Segmentation for Angular Acceleration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current helmets inadequately address the reduction of head angular acceleration during impacts, which is linked to the development of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) in athletes, particularly due to repetitive concussive and sub-concussive head impacts.

Innovation Solution

A helmet subliner system comprising three types of subliner elements made of energy-absorbing viscoelastic foam materials, strategically positioned around the head to distribute impact forces and reduce angular acceleration, including a first type aligned with the headband area, a second type in the middle area, and a third type with a flat surface tangent to the head, all attached to the inner shell using a hook and loop fastener mechanism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional single-type subliner is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but head angular acceleration reduction effectiveness is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead angular acceleration reduction effectivenessVSAvoidsubliner system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The subliner is divided into three distinct types of elements (first, second, and third types) with different material properties and compression characteristics, strategically positioned in different head regions to address varying impact forces and reduce angular acceleration effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each subliner element type is assigned specific material properties and compression stress characteristics appropriate for its designated head region, with the first type having higher compression resistance for lateral impacts, the second type for moderate regions, and the third type with flat surface for crown protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If uniform foam material is used throughout the subliner, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but impact force distribution across different head regions is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact force distribution effectivenessVSAvoidsubliner manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The subliner is segmented into three element types with distinct material properties, allowing each segment to be optimized for the specific impact forces and anatomical features of its designated head region

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different foam materials with specific compression stress characteristics are assigned to different head regions: first type elements (≥50 psi) for high-impact lateral regions, second type elements (<10 psi) for moderate regions, and third type elements (≥50 psi) for crown protection, matching material properties to local impact requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If subliner elements are positioned without strategic alignment, then installation simplicity is maintained, but angular acceleration reduction during lateral impacts is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveangular acceleration reduction during lateral impactsVSAvoidelement positioning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Subliner elements are strategically positioned and oriented according to the specific anatomical features and impact vulnerability of each head region, with first type elements aligned with headband area for lateral impact protection, second type elements in middle areas, and third type elements with flat surfaces tangent to the crown

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The subliner system effectively reduces head angular acceleration during impacts, thereby mitigating the risk of CTE by distributing and absorbing forces more efficiently across the head, enhancing protection and comfort.

Implementation Method 1

The first type of subliner elements are constructed of an energy absorbing viscoelastic foam material capable of exhibiting a compressive stress of at least 50 psi for a dynamic compression of 50%

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 2

The subliner system effectively reduces head angular acceleration during impacts, thereby mitigating the risk of CTE by distributing and absorbing forces more efficiently across the head

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 3

capable of exhibiting a compressive stress of at least 50 psi for a dynamic compression of 50%

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS11696612B2Helmet
Publication Date: 2023.07.11 LIONHEAD HELMET INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES LP
  • US11696612B2 patent drawing
  • US11696612B2 patent drawing
  • US11696612B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A helmet to be worn on a head having an annular headband shaped area. The headband shaped area positioned near an upper junction of the ears and the wearer's head. A top area is centered about a top of the wearer's head. A middle area defined between the headband area and the top area. The helmet includes a shell having an inner surface. A first type of subliner elements extend from the inner surface at a location such that the first type of subliner elements are aligned with the headband area. A second type of subliner elements extend from the inner surface at a location such that the second type of subliner elements are aligned with the middle area. A third type of subliner element extends from the inner surface at a location such that the third type of subliner element is aligned with the top area.