Helmet Venous Compression for Brain Motion Limitation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional helmet designs fail to effectively limit brain movement within the skull during sudden deceleration or acceleration, leading to ongoing brain injuries despite efforts to protect the skull from external impacts.

Innovation Solution

A brain injury reduction system that reduces venous drainage from the intracranial compartment through mechanisms like glottis closure, valsalva maneuver, or external compression of jugular veins, maintaining central venous pressure to minimize brain movement within the calvarium during head impacts or blast pressure waves.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional helmets with rigid or flexible exterior designs are used, then skull protection is improved, but brain motion limitation during sudden deceleration or acceleration is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskull protectionVSAvoidbrain injury prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by using sensors to detect impending head impacts and activating actuators in advance to compress the jugular veins, reducing venous drainage and increasing intracranial pressure before the impact occurs. This pre-positioning of protective pressure counteracts the brain's tendency to move during sudden deceleration, addressing the limitation of conventional helmets that only protect the skull but do not actively prevent brain motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Reliability

If venous drainage is reduced through jugular vein compression, then brain motion is limited during head acceleration or deceleration, but intracranial pressure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrain motion limitationVSAvoidintracranial pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic action by activating venous compression only during detected head impacts or sudden accelerations rather than continuously. The control system monitors acceleration sensors and triggers the actuators temporarily during impact events, allowing normal venous drainage during non-impact periods. This intermittent application limits brain motion when needed while avoiding sustained intracranial pressure elevation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of venous drainage dynamically based on impact detection. During normal conditions, venous drainage proceeds freely. Upon detecting head acceleration or impact, the system compresses the jugular veins to reduce drainage and increase intracranial pressure, thereby limiting brain motion. After the impact event, the compression is released and drainage returns to normal, allowing the system to adapt pressure conditions to operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the system activates protective measures during head impact, then brain injury is reduced, but response time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrain injury reductionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical protection mechanisms with a sensor-actuator control system. Instead of using bulky mechanical structures to physically restrain the brain, the system uses acceleration sensors to detect impacts and electrically controlled actuators to compress veins. This substitution of mechanical restraint with physiological pressure control reduces overall system complexity while maintaining effective brain injury protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces brain injury by minimizing brain tissue distortion and deformation during sudden head movements, thereby decreasing the severity of brain injuries caused by acceleration or deceleration.

Implementation Method 1

external compression of jugular veins

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExternal compression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

valsalva maneuver

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectValsalva maneuver: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 3

glottis closure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGlottis closure:

Data Source

PatentUS20240099928A1Reducing brain injury by limiting brain motion during sudden deceleration or acceleration of the head
Publication Date: 2024.03.28 PREACTIVE TECH INC
  • US20240099928A1 patent drawing
  • US20240099928A1 patent drawing
  • US20240099928A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A brain injury reduction system provides a protective measure that temporarily or decreases venous drainage out of the intracranial compartment during or immediately before and during a sudden change in acceleration of an individual's head. Specifically, a wearable helmet or other wearable structure of the brain injury reduction system detects an impending collision and determines whether a protective measure is needed. If so, one or more actuation devices provides the protective measure to reduce venous drainage through one or both of the internal jugular veins or paravertebral venous plexus. A first actuation device stimulates a gag reflex or valsalva-like maneuver to reduce venous drainage through the paravertebral venous plexus. A second actuation device can physically compress the internal jugular veins. Thus, the brain injury reduction system minimizes the detrimental impact that may occur due to the sudden change in acceleration of the individual's head