Herbicidal Quinolines Selective Weed Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current herbicidal compounds are limited in their effectiveness and specificity for controlling weeds in crops, often affecting desirable plant growth and requiring multiple applications.

Innovation Solution

Development of novel herbicidal compounds of Formula (I), specifically N-(tetrazol-5-yl)- and N-(triazol-5-yl)-arylcarboxamides, which are designed to selectively target and inhibit weed growth with improved agronomic acceptability and formulation into various herbicidal compositions for efficient application.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current herbicidal compounds are used to control weeds, then weed control is achieved, but desirable plant growth is affected and multiple applications are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control effectivenessVSAvoidimpact on crop plants
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing specific substituent patterns at defined positions on the aromatic ring of the herbicidal compound. Different substituents (halogens, alkyl groups, alkoxy groups, etc.) are placed at specific positions (R1-R6) to create compounds with localized functional properties that enhance selectivity between weed and crop plants, allowing effective weed control while minimizing impact on desirable plants

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically varying the chemical structure parameters of the herbicidal compounds, including different types of substituents (fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine, methyl, ethyl, propyl, etc.), their positions on the aromatic ring, and their combinations. These structural parameter variations create a series of compounds with different biological activities and selectivities, enabling optimization for specific weed-crop systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Duration of action of stationary object

If current herbicidal compounds are applied repeatedly to control weeds, then weed control is maintained, but application frequency and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduration of weed controlVSAvoidtime for multiple applications
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses continuity of useful action by developing herbicidal compounds designed to provide sustained weed control activity. The chemical structures are optimized for persistent biological activity in the target system, allowing a single application to maintain effective weed control over an extended period, thereby eliminating the need for repeated applications and reducing time loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If current herbicidal compounds are used to control weeds, then some weed control is achieved, but specificity for targeting weeds versus crops is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control effectivenessVSAvoidselectivity between weed and crop
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing specific substituent patterns at defined positions on the aromatic ring of the herbicidal compound. Different substituents (halogens, alkyl groups, alkoxy groups, etc.) are placed at specific positions (R1-R6) to create compounds with localized functional properties that enhance selectivity between weed and crop plants, allowing effective weed control while minimizing impact on desirable plants

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically varying the chemical structure parameters of the herbicidal compounds, including different types of substituents (fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine, methyl, ethyl, propyl, etc.), their positions on the aromatic ring, and their combinations. These structural parameter variations create a series of compounds with different biological activities and selectivities, enabling optimization for specific weed-crop systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3191465B1Herbicidal quinolines
Publication Date: 2018.12.19 SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG
  • EP3191465B1 patent drawing
  • EP3191465B1 patent drawing
  • EP3191465B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to compounds of formula (I), or an agronomically acceptable salt of said compounds wherein A1a, A1b, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5 and R6 are as defined herein. The invention further relates to herbicidal compositions which comprise a compound of Formula (I), and to their use for controlling weeds, in particular in crops of useful plants.