Heterogeneous Reconfigurable Arrays With Clustered ALU-Multiplexer Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reconfigurable computing devices face challenges in optimizing the ratio of different processing elements and interconnects to achieve efficient functionality, leading to inefficiencies in processing and resource utilization, particularly in managing control flow and handling multi-bit versus 1-bit operations.

Innovation Solution

A heterogeneous array design is implemented, using clusters of ALUs and multiplexers as processing elements, with direct intra-cluster connections and a general-purpose routing network, allowing for efficient data processing and control signal routing, enabling flexible implementation of various logic functions and circuits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If heterogeneous processing elements (ALUs and multiplexers) are used in clusters, then processing efficiency and speed are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The array is divided into clusters, where each cluster contains a heterogeneous mix of ALUs and multiplexers. This segmentation allows different types of processing elements to be grouped together to handle specific processing tasks efficiently, improving overall productivity while managing complexity through modular organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The heterogeneous processing elements within each cluster are designed to perform multiple functions. ALUs handle arithmetic and logical operations while multiplexers handle data routing and selection, allowing the cluster to serve as a universal processing unit that can adapt to different computational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Speed

If direct intra-cluster connections are implemented, then data processing speed is improved, but interconnect complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing speedVSAvoidinterconnect complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interconnect structure is segmented into intra-cluster connections and inter-cluster connections. Direct intra-cluster connections provide fast data processing within clusters, while the general-purpose routing network handles communications between clusters, balancing speed requirements with interconnect manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different connection types are used for different spatial relationships: direct wired connections are used for local intra-cluster communications where speed is critical, while the general-purpose routing network is used for more distant inter-cluster communications, optimizing the balance between speed and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If clusters with heterogeneous elements are used, then adaptability for different applications is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication adaptabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The array is manufactured as an integrated circuit with pre-defined cluster structures containing heterogeneous elements. This segmentation into standardized clusters simplifies the manufacturing process while maintaining adaptability, as the same cluster design can be replicated throughout the array to serve different applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The heterogeneous processing elements are designed with universal interfaces and standardized connection patterns that allow the same hardware structure to be configured for different applications through software control, reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7471643B2Loosely-biased heterogeneous reconfigurable arrays
Publication Date: 2008.12.30 PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP
  • US7471643B2 patent drawing
  • US7471643B2 patent drawing
  • US7471643B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A heterogeneous array includes clusters of processing elements. The clusters include a combination of ALUs and multiplexers linked by direct connections and various general-purpose routing networks. The multiplexers are controlled by the ALUs in the same cluster, or alternatively by ALUs in other clusters, via a dedicated multiplexer control network. Components of applications configured onto the array are selectively implemented in either multiplexers or ALUs, as determined by the relative efficiency of implementing the component in one or the other type of processing element, and by the relative availability of the processing element types. Multiplexer control signals are generated from combinations of ALU status signals, and optionally routed to control multiplexers in different clusters.