Heterogeneous Quantum Processor Architecture for Noise Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Quantum processor architectures face a tradeoff between high connectivity, which allows for solving more complex problems but increases noise susceptibility, and low connectivity, which reduces noise but limits problem-solving capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A heterogeneous quantum processor architecture is designed with qubits of varying connectivity, where a subset of qubits has high connectivity to behave classically and reduce noise, while others maintain low connectivity for quantum mechanical operations, effectively creating a small-world network to balance noise reduction and problem-solving capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If high connectivity is implemented in quantum processor architecture, then problem-solving capability is improved, but noise susceptibility increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproblem-solving capabilityVSAvoidnoise susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating heterogeneous qubit regions with different connectivity characteristics. Inner qubits have high connectivity (6-8 neighbors) to enable complex problem-solving, while outer qubits have low connectivity (2-4 neighbors) to minimize noise exposure. This spatial differentiation of connectivity quality allows the system to simultaneously achieve both high adaptability and low noise susceptibility in different regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The quantum processor is segmented into distinct functional regions: an inner core of highly connected qubits for complex computations and an outer layer of sparsely connected qubits for noise-resistant operations. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each region's connectivity to match its computational role, resolving the contradiction between overall system capability and individual qubit noise exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If low connectivity is used in quantum processor architecture, then noise susceptibility is reduced, but problem-solving capability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise susceptibilityVSAvoidproblem-solving capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two previously separate quantum processor architectures into a single heterogeneous system: a high-connectivity quantum annealer core for complex optimization problems and a low-connectivity quantum computer peripheral for noise-sensitive operations. This combination allows the system to solve sophisticated problems while protecting vulnerable qubits from noise through the merged architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The outer low-connectivity qubit layer acts as an intermediary protective layer between the high-connectivity inner core and the external environment. This intermediary structure shields the sensitive inner qubits from noise while still enabling them to participate in computational processes, thus preserving problem-solving capability without directly exposing inner qubits to harmful noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the average number of coupling steps between qubits, minimizing noise while enabling the solution of more sophisticated problems by incorporating both classical and quantum devices within the same architecture.

Implementation Method 1

integrated circuits formed of superconducting material, such as aluminum and/or niobium, to define superconducting qubits

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuperconductivity: Superconductivity

Implementation Method 2

a superconducting loop (i.e., a 'qubit loop') that is interrupted by at least one Josephson junction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJosephson effect: Josephson Effect

Implementation Method 3

evolving a system from a known initial Hamiltonian (the Hamiltonian being an operator whose eigenvalues are the allowed energies of the system) to a final Hamiltonian by gradually changing the Hamiltonian

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdiabatic evolution:

Implementation Method 4

quantum annealing may use quantum effects, such as quantum tunneling, to reach a global energy minimum more accurately and/or more quickly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuantum tunneling:

Data Source

PatentUS8063657B2Systems and devices for quantum processor architectures
Publication Date: 2011.11.22 D WAVE SYSTEMS INC
  • US8063657B2 patent drawing
  • US8063657B2 patent drawing
  • US8063657B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A quantum processor may employ a heterogeneous qubit-coupling architecture to reduce the average number of intermediate coupling steps that separate any two qubits in the quantum processor, while limiting the overall susceptibility to noise of the qubits. The architecture may effectively realize a small-world network where the average qubit has a low connectivity (thereby allowing it to operate substantially quantum mechanically) but each qubit is within a relatively low number of intermediate coupling steps from any other qubit. To realize such, some of the qubits may have a relatively high connectivity, and may thus operate substantially classically.