Heterogeneous Sensor Network Control for Multimodal Data Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless sensor networks struggle with efficient resource management and data fusion across heterogeneous sensor nodes, leading to suboptimal performance in object detection, tracking, and classification due to limited computing power, communication bandwidth, and dynamic network topologies.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop system employing reinforcement learning and game theory optimization for autonomous control of heterogeneous sensor networks, enabling adaptive sensor management and data fusion through multimodal data representation and decentralized decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If sensor nodes increase in number and heterogeneity to improve coverage and detection capability, then situational awareness and detection performance improve, but resource management complexity and communication overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection performanceVSAvoidresource management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the sensor network into heterogeneous sensor nodes with specialized functions, where each node type is optimized for specific detection tasks. This segmentation allows improved detection performance through specialized sensors while managing complexity through modular node design and standardized communication protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic resource allocation and adaptive data fusion strategies that adjust to changing network conditions and detection requirements. This dynamic approach optimizes resource utilization across heterogeneous nodes while maintaining detection performance, resolving the contradiction between network complexity and management efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If computing power and processing capacity are increased to improve data fusion and object identification, then detection accuracy improves, but energy consumption and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by performing data fusion and processing at the edge of the network using distributed algorithms on sensor nodes themselves, rather than concentrating all processing at a central location. This reduces energy consumption by minimizing data transmission while maintaining detection accuracy through localized intelligent processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary processing layers that aggregate and pre-process data from multiple sensors before final fusion, reducing the computational burden on individual nodes while maintaining overall detection accuracy. This intermediary approach balances energy consumption with processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If communication bandwidth is increased to improve data exchange and coordination, then network coordination and collaborative detection improve, but system cost and infrastructure requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork coordination efficiencyVSAvoidinfrastructure requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic data exchange and coordinated sampling strategies where sensors communicate at optimized intervals rather than continuously. This periodic approach maintains effective network coordination and collaborative detection while significantly reducing communication bandwidth requirements and infrastructure complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses data compression and selective data transmission where only essential or changed information is communicated between nodes. This copying approach maintains coordination efficiency by transmitting only necessary data updates, reducing bandwidth requirements while preserving network collaboration effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12452957B2Closed loop tasking and control of heterogeneous sensor networks
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 SARCOS CORP
  • US12452957B2 patent drawing
  • US12452957B2 patent drawing
  • US12452957B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Technology is described for controlling a heterogeneous sensor node network. The method can include obtaining sensor data from a plurality of sensors which include a plurality of sensor modalities in sensor nodes. The sensor data may be combined in a joint feature space that represents multimodal input. Another operation may be detecting features from the sensor data using the joint feature space. Neighboring sensor nodes may be identified to receive the features. A further operation may be sending the features to other sensor nodes in a sensor node network.