Heterogeneous Task Scheduling with Dynamic Dependency Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for processing multiple tasks in heterogeneous computing systems result in low overall task completion efficiency and underutilization of hardware resources due to serial processing and interdependencies among tasks.

Innovation Solution

A method that utilizes task description information with depending and depended information identifiers to dynamically update task dependencies, allowing for the identification and execution of tasks that do not depend on others, thereby enabling parallel processing and efficient resource utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If tasks are processed in serial order based on dependencies, then task execution correctness is ensured, but overall task completion efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution correctnessVSAvoidtask completion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates and stores dependency relationships between tasks before execution. By maintaining a dependency graph and pre-identifying which tasks can be executed in parallel, the system avoids runtime dependency checking while enabling efficient parallel execution. This preliminary analysis allows tasks to be launched without waiting for predecessor tasks to complete, resolving the contradiction between correctness and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic task scheduling where the execution order is not fixed but adapts based on real-time completion status of dependent tasks. Tasks are continuously monitored and added to the execution queue as their dependencies are satisfied. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain correctness by respecting dependencies while maximizing parallel execution opportunities, thereby improving overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If hardware resources are allocated to tasks with dependencies, then resource utilization improves, but idle time increases due to waiting for dependent tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoididle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-identifies tasks that are ready for execution by checking dependency satisfaction before task launch. By maintaining a ready queue of tasks whose dependencies are met, the system can immediately allocate hardware resources to executable tasks without idle waiting. This eliminates resource idle time while maintaining high utilization by continuously having tasks ready for execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuous utilization of hardware resources by maintaining a pipeline of ready tasks. As tasks complete, new tasks are immediately launched to replace them, ensuring the processing device is continuously busy. The system monitors task completion and dynamically adds newly eligible tasks to the execution queue, eliminating gaps and idle time between task executions while maintaining high resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If all task dependencies are resolved before execution, then execution correctness is maintained, but task queue update complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution correctnessVSAvoidtask queue update complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the task dependency management into distinct components: a dependency graph for storing relationships, a ready queue for tasks ready for execution, and an execution queue for pending tasks. Each component has a specific function, and updates are localized to specific segments rather than requiring global re-evaluation. This segmentation simplifies the update process while maintaining execution correctness by ensuring dependencies are properly tracked.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where task completion triggers automatic updates to the dependency graph and ready queue. When a task completes, the system notifies dependent tasks and updates their status accordingly. This feedback loop ensures correctness by maintaining accurate dependency information while reducing complexity through automated updates rather than manual tracking. The feedback mechanism efficiently propagates dependency satisfaction information throughout the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260003670A1Method for processing plurality of tasks, processing device, and heterogeneous computing system
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 MOORE THREADS TECH CO LTD
  • US20260003670A1 patent drawing
  • US20260003670A1 patent drawing
  • US20260003670A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for processing a plurality of tasks includes: obtaining task description information for a task, the task description information comprising a dependency information identifier and a dependent information identifier, the dependency information identifier indicating the number of a first type of tasks associated with the task, and the dependent information identifier at least indicating whether a second type of task associated with the task exists in the plurality of tasks; in response to the task execution ending, updating the dependency information identifier of the second type of task associated with the task, so as to determine from the second type of task associated with the task any tasks to be executed which no longer directly depend on any task; adding the tasks to be executed into a tasks to be executed queue; and executing the tasks to be executed located in the tasks to be executed queue.