Heterophasic Polypropylene Composition for Balanced Stiffness and Impact

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing polypropylene compositions struggle to achieve a well-balanced relation between stiffness and impact strength, while also maintaining low volatile and semi-volatile emissions and good processability, particularly at higher melt flow rates.

Innovation Solution

The development of polypropylene compositions comprising 60 to 95 wt.% of a first heterophasic propylene copolymer, which includes a crystalline propylene matrix and an amorphous propylene-ethylene elastomer, combined with 5 to 40 wt.% of an elastomeric ethylene/alpha-olefin random copolymer, and optionally a second heterophasic propylene copolymer and a reinforcing mineral filler.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If MFR is increased to improve processability and reduce wall thickness, then processability is improved, but impact strength is significantly reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprocessabilityVSAvoidimpact strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a heterophasic polypropylene composition consisting of a crystalline polypropylene matrix phase and an amorphous elastomeric phase dispersed within it. This composite structure allows the crystalline phase to provide structural integrity and the elastomeric phase to provide impact resistance, even at higher MFR values where impact strength would normally deteriorate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical and chemical parameters of the polypropylene composition by controlling the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the amorphous elastomeric phase to be between -50°C and 0°C, and by specifying an intrinsic viscosity (IV) range of 2.0 to 5.0 dl/g. These parameter optimizations enable the material to maintain balanced mechanical properties including impact strength at higher MFR values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If MFR is increased to improve processability, then processability is improved, but volatile and semi-volatile emissions are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprocessabilityVSAvoidVOC and FOG emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the compositional parameters by precisely controlling the elastomer content (25-65 wt.-%) and the intrinsic viscosity of the amorphous phase (2.0-5.0 dl/g). This parameter optimization reduces the total MFR to a controlled range of 25-100 g/10 min, which significantly lowers volatile and semi-volatile emissions while maintaining adequate processability for thin-walled applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If elastomer content is increased to improve impact strength, then impact strength is improved, but stiffness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact strengthVSAvoidstiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The heterophasic structure creates a composite material where the crystalline polypropylene matrix provides stiffness and structural support, while the dispersed amorphous elastomeric phase provides impact resistance. This phase separation allows both properties to coexist without significant compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating distinct phases with different properties: the crystalline matrix regions provide local stiffness and structural integrity, while the amorphous elastomeric regions provide local energy absorption for impact resistance. The Tg of the elastomeric phase is specifically controlled to -50°C to 0°C to optimize this local energy dissipation mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If MFR is reduced to maintain impact strength, then impact strength is maintained, but processability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact strengthVSAvoidprocessability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The heterophasic composite structure enables the material to achieve a total MFR of 25-100 g/10 min while maintaining impact strength. The crystalline matrix provides structural support that prevents excessive viscosity, while the elastomeric phase contributes to impact resistance, creating a balanced composite that satisfies both requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS12240969B2Polypropylene composition with improved processability and impact strength
Publication Date: 2025.03.04 BOREALIS AG
  • US12240969B2 patent drawing
  • US12240969B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to heterophasic polypropylene compositions comprising a propylene homo- or copolymer forming a crystalline fraction as a matrix and an amorphous propylene ethylene elastomer as a soluble fraction dispersed in said matrix. The heterophasic polypropylene compositions further comprise an elastomeric ethylene/alpha-olefin random copolymer. The heterophasic polypropylene compositions have a well-balanced relation between stiffness and impact strength, low volatile and semi-volatile emissions and good processability.