Heuristic Optimization System With Statistical Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Heuristic optimization methods, such as simulated annealing, face challenges in confirming the optimality of solutions due to stochastic operations, making it difficult to understand solution variability and adjust parameters like annealing time effectively.

Innovation Solution

An optimization system that includes an optimization processing unit solving problems using heuristic methods, a calculation unit that calculates statistical information like variance and confidence intervals, and an output control unit presenting this information to users, allowing for better understanding and adjustment of parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If heuristic optimization methods are used to solve optimization problems, then solution flexibility and adaptability are improved, but the ability to confirm solution optimality deteriorates due to stochastic operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution flexibilityVSAvoidoptimality confirmation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by calculating statistical information (variance, standard deviation, confidence intervals) from multiple heuristic solutions and using this information to guide further optimization. The system continuously monitors solution quality metrics and adjusts the optimization process based on this feedback, allowing users to assess solution optimality despite the stochastic nature of heuristic methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct deterministic optimization with a statistical approach. Instead of relying on a single mechanical optimization process, the system generates multiple stochastic solutions and uses statistical analysis to evaluate optimality, substituting the need for precise determinism with probabilistic assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If multiple solutions are generated to assess optimality, then measurement precision of solution quality is improved, but loss of time increases due to additional calculations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution quality assessment accuracyVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by generating a limited number of heuristic solutions (not exhaustive) and using statistical sampling to assess optimality. Instead of exploring the entire solution space, the system generates enough solutions to achieve statistically meaningful results, balancing accuracy with computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts parameters such as the number of solutions to generate, confidence interval thresholds, and variance criteria based on problem characteristics and time constraints. This allows flexible control over the trade-off between assessment accuracy and computational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If statistical information calculation is implemented to assess solution optimality, then information completeness about solution variability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution variability informationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-functional optimization system that simultaneously performs heuristic solution generation, statistical analysis, and optimality assessment. The same computational infrastructure serves multiple purposes: generating solutions, calculating statistical metrics, and providing user feedback, thereby managing complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically calculates statistical information and generates optimality assessments without requiring external intervention. The optimization process is self-evaluating, using its own generated solutions to compute variance, standard deviation, and confidence intervals, thereby reducing the need for additional external analytical tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If confidence intervals and variance are calculated for each solution, then measurement precision of solution reliability is improved, but use of energy increases due to additional computational operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution reliabilityVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates statistical measures (variance, standard deviation, confidence intervals) for a subset of generated solutions rather than all possible solutions. This partial calculation approach provides sufficient reliability information while significantly reducing the computational energy required compared to exhaustive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240193223A1Optimization system, optimization method, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2024.06.13 NEC CORP
  • US20240193223A1 patent drawing
  • US20240193223A1 patent drawing
  • US20240193223A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An artificial intelligence (AI) system solves an optimization problem by a heuristic solution, calculates statistical information of the solution based on the solution obtained by solving, and outputs the statistical information to a terminal device of a user.