Hexagonal Chess Board Pawn Reformation Dynamics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional chess and its variants face issues such as slow game development, complex piece movements, limited pawn restructuring, excessive queen presence leading to power imbalance, and a high probability of ties, making the game dull and tedious for novice players.

Innovation Solution

A chess game played on a diamond-shaped board with hexagonal spaces, featuring a reduced set of chessmen and modified movement rules, including restricted pawn redemption and unique piece movements, to enhance strategic complexity and game completion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional chess rules are used, then the game has strategic complexity, but the game development is slow and perceived as dull

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrategic complexityVSAvoidgame development speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by allowing pawns to change their movement characteristics based on game state. Pawns can be reformed from scattered positions back into structured formations, and their movement capabilities dynamically adjust based on whether they are in formation or scattered, enabling both strategic depth and faster game progression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by modifying pawn movement rules mid-game. Pawns can be reformed into different configurations (single file, double file, etc.) which changes their movement parameters. This allows the game to transition from slow traditional development to faster restructured gameplay while maintaining strategic complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If pawn redemption rules are used, then pawns can be redeemed for major pieces, but multiple queens upset the balance of power too early

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepawn redemption flexibilityVSAvoidpower balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making pawn redemption rules position-dependent and configuration-dependent. Pawns can only be reformed into specific configurations (single file, double file, etc.) in specific zones of the board, and redemption options are limited based on local game conditions rather than allowing unrestricted redemption for any major piece anywhere on the board.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by requiring pawns to be reformed into specific configurations before they can be redeemed for major pieces. This preliminary restructuring phase ensures that the board state is properly prepared and that redemption occurs at appropriate strategic moments, preventing premature power imbalances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If traditional piece movement rules are used, then each piece has specific movement patterns, but pawn movement is confusing with four different sets of moves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepiece movement varietyVSAvoidmovement rule simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by making pawns multi-functional through reformation. Instead of having four different move sets for individual pawns, the patent creates a universal reformation mechanism where scattered pawns can collectively transform into structured formations that then move as unified units. This single reformation function replaces multiple complex individual movement rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges individual pawn movements into collective pawn formation movements. By combining scattered pawns into reformed configurations (single file, double file, etc.), the patent reduces the complexity from tracking individual pawn movements to tracking formation movements, simplifying the rules while maintaining strategic variety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Stability of the object's composition

If pawns are restricted from moving forward-left or forward-right except when capturing, then pawn structure is maintained, but restructuring capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepawn structure stabilityVSAvoidpawn restructuring capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making pawn structure rules conditional on game state. Pawns maintain their traditional restricted movement when in formation (stability), but can dynamically reform into new configurations when scattered (adaptability). This dynamic rule application allows the system to switch between stability and restructuring based on game conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

5Device complexity

If traditional chess board and pieces are used, then the game follows conventional rules, but the end game is tedious with kings slowly cornering each other

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegame rule traditionVSAvoidend game engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by allowing continuous pawn reformation throughout the game including the end game. This dynamic restructuring capability prevents the traditional end-game stagnation where only kings and queens remain, as pawns can continuously reform and create new tactical opportunities, maintaining engagement while preserving traditional chess fundamentals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

6Device complexity

If traditional pawn movement rules are used, then pawns move forward only, but pawns cannot restructure once out of formation leading to dissatisfying tie games

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepawn movement simplicityVSAvoidgame completion
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes parameters by allowing pawns to alter their movement parameters through reformation. When pawns are out of formation, they can reform into structured configurations which changes their movement parameters from individual scattered movements to coordinated formation movements. This parameter change ensures games continue rather than ending in stalemates, improving game completion reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8678390B2Chess game and method of play
Publication Date: 2014.03.25 GUYER JIM P
  • US8678390B2 patent drawing
  • US8678390B2 patent drawing
  • US8678390B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A chess-like game has a two-dimensional game board made up of 49 regular hexagonal play spaces assembled into a clustered, stylized diamond shape where seven spaces are arranged side-by-side, contiguously in a central, latitudinal row. Each successive parallel latitudinal row has one less space and its spaces are offset. By the sixth row away from the central row, a single hex space is provided at either end of the board. The color of each space is selected from three available. No space of a first color shares a hex side with a space of a similar color. A reduced set of game pieces are used where each side has one king, one queen, one bishop, one rook, one knight, and five pawns. Each piece has defined legal moves.