Hex Geometry Golf Ball Protrusion for Drag Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current golf ball designs fail to optimize aerodynamic properties effectively, leading to suboptimal drag reduction and distance enhancement, despite advancements like hexagonal patterns and 'Dimple-in-Dimple' technologies.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a protrusion at the center of the hex geometry with an increased ball radius, and a cover layer with multi-faceted polygons or dimples, each with a protrusion extending from the center, to reduce drag by altering fluid flow dynamics and recirculation regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional hexagonal patterns or Dimple-in-Dimple technology are used, then aerodynamic properties are improved to some extent, but drag reduction and distance enhancement are not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic distanceVSAvoiddrag reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by placing a protrusion at the specific location of the dimple center, creating a localized structural variation. This protrusion modifies the fluid flow dynamics precisely where needed - at the dimple center - to optimize aerodynamic performance while maintaining the overall dimple structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional dimple surface pattern to a three-dimensional structure by adding a protrusion that extends upward from the dimple center. This dimensional addition creates a new geometric feature that actively interacts with airflow, enhancing drag reduction beyond what flat or concave patterns alone can achieve

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If protrusion height is increased to improve aerodynamic performance, then drag reduction increases, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrag reductionVSAvoidprotrusion height tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies a protrusion height range of 0.0002 to 0.002 inches, representing a controlled parameter change that balances aerodynamic benefit with manufacturability. This quantitative parameter definition allows optimization of drag reduction while establishing tolerances that are achievable with standard manufacturing processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design significantly improves aerodynamic distance and trajectory by decreasing overall drag, as demonstrated by increased carry distance and apex height compared to control golf balls, with measured lift and drag values showing enhanced performance.

Implementation Method 1

to reduce drag by altering fluid flow dynamics and recirculation regions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow dynamics:

Implementation Method 2

This design significantly improves aerodynamic distance and trajectory by decreasing overall drag

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag reduction: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS10213653B1Dot geometry for a golf ball surface
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY
  • US10213653B1 patent drawing
  • US10213653B1 patent drawing
  • US10213653B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A golf ball with an aerodynamic design is disclosed herein. The aerodynamic design has a protrusion at a center of a hex geometry representing an increase in ball radius greater than 0.0005 inches from a minimum ball radius. The minimum ball radius is located between 0.01 and 0.04 inch (11%-46%) from the center of the hex geometry.