Hexagonal Concrete Slab Framing System for Curl Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Concrete slab panels tend to curl during the curing process due to differential shrinkage, leading to stress and cracks, which is costly to address with traditional methods such as saw-cut joints and reinforcement with steel rebar.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that subdivides a continuous concrete slab into hexagonal panels using mounting frames and posts, eliminating the need for saw-cut joints and steel reinforcement by inducing cracks and acting as joint fillers, thereby reducing curling and stress.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional saw-cut joints and steel reinforcement are used to address curling, then crack control and structural integrity are improved, but construction cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack controlVSAvoidconstruction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous concrete slab is divided into multiple hexagonal panels using mounting frames and posts. This segmentation creates controlled joints that accommodate differential shrinkage and curling, preventing random cracking while eliminating the need for expensive saw-cut joints and steel reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting frames and posts are installed before concrete pouring to pre-establish the joint locations and panel boundaries. This preliminary action ensures that cracks occur at predetermined locations along the frame edges rather than randomly, achieving crack control without additional cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Shape

If saw-cut joints are made to control crack propagation, then aesthetic appearance is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic appearanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting frames are installed before concrete pouring to pre-establish joint locations. This eliminates the need for post-pouring saw-cut operations, as the frames themselves create the joint lines that guide crack propagation along aesthetically pleasing hexagonal patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The saw-cut operation is extracted from the construction process entirely. Instead of cutting joints after concrete hardening, the mounting frames create the joints during pouring, eliminating the complex saw-cutting equipment and operations while maintaining aesthetic crack patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Strength

If steel rebar is added to reinforce the slab, then structural strength is improved, but construction cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidconstruction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The slab is segmented into smaller hexagonal panels that are less prone to curling and cracking. This segmentation inherently reduces the tensile stresses that would require steel reinforcement, allowing the use of unreinforced or minimally reinforced concrete while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting frames, which create joints that might be considered weaknesses, actually become the strength mechanism by controlling where cracks occur. The frames convert the potential harm of uncontrolled cracking into the benefit of predictable, aesthetically pleasing crack patterns along the frame edges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method significantly reduces curling and stress in concrete slabs, allowing for even curing and minimizing the need for reinforcement, resulting in cost-effective and aesthetically pleasing concrete slabs with reduced maintenance.

Implementation Method 1

Differential shrinkage is the basic cause of curling. This occurs as the exposed top surface of the slab shrinks and the core of the slab does not.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferential shrinkage: Thermal Contraction

Data Source

PatentUS9708778B2Concrete slab panel forming, reinforcing, joint sealing and edge protecting framing system
Publication Date: 2017.07.18 MESSINA GIANFRANCO
  • US9708778B2 patent drawing
  • US9708778B2 patent drawing
  • US9708778B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for forming, reinforcing, joint sealing and edge protecting of a concrete slab panel, wherein the concrete slab panel having a volume, a length, a width, and a surface. The device comprising of an elongated post having a body, a top end and a bottom end with a plurality of elongated grooves extending along the body; a mounting frame has a length, a width and a thickness. The mounting frames having a connecting means to connect the mounting frame to the posts. The present invention eliminates the needs for saw-cut lines for crack inducement and acts as a joint sealer for the concrete slab to relieve the tensile stresses.