Hexagonal Handle Surface for Surgical Instrument Grip

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical instruments face challenges in providing optimal grip, preventing slipping, and ensuring effective cleaning, particularly due to issues with glove compatibility and liquid accumulation after sterilization, while maintaining hygiene and safety standards.

Innovation Solution

A medical instrument with a handle surface featuring a hexagonal edge structure formed by rectangular enclosure portions, creating a honeycomb pattern that allows for high grip without direction dependency, even force distribution, and easy cleaning, while preventing glove damage and liquid accumulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the handle surface portion has deep grooves with pyramid shape and triangular cross-sectional profile to prevent slipping, then grip security is improved, but the handle surface damages the surgeon's glove and creates cleaning difficulties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip securityVSAvoidglove damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces sharp pyramid-shaped grooves with rounded, dome-shaped enclosures having curved surfaces. This curvature eliminates sharp edges that cut gloves while maintaining the mechanical interlocking effect for grip security. The rounded geometry allows force distribution without concentration at specific points, preventing glove damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the surface structures from sharp angular pyramids to rounded domes with specific radius ratios. The enclosure radius to opening radius ratio is optimized to provide sufficient grip while ensuring rounded transitions that prevent glove cutting. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction between grip effectiveness and glove protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the handle surface portion has deep grooves to achieve good grip, then friction force is increased, but liquid accumulates in the grooves after sterilization and cleaning becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip securityVSAvoidcleaning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The rounded dome-shaped enclosures with curved surfaces prevent liquid accumulation by eliminating sharp corners and flat bottoms where liquid would pool. The curved geometry facilitates liquid runoff during cleaning and sterilization processes, making the handle easier to clean while maintaining grip effectiveness through the same rounded structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the depth, width, and curvature radius of the enclosures to achieve a balance between grip provision and liquid drainage. The specific radius ratios ensure that the enclosures are deep enough to provide mechanical interlocking for grip but have curved profiles that prevent liquid pooling, thereby improving cleaning efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the handle surface portion has grooves oriented at specific angles to the longitudinal axis to optimize grip for thumb application, then grip security is improved, but the grip becomes direction-dependent and less effective for other handling orientations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip securityVSAvoiddirection independence
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses an asymmetric hexagonal arrangement of rounded enclosures that provides optimized grip in the primary thumb application direction while maintaining adequate grip in other orientations. The hexagonal symmetry with six-fold arrangement creates direction-dependent optimization without complete directionality, balancing grip security with handling versatility for different surgical instruments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The hexagonal enclosure arrangement serves multiple functions: it provides optimized grip for thumb application, maintains adequate grip for other finger configurations, and offers consistent performance across different instrument orientations. This multi-functional design resolves the contradiction between direction-specific optimization and general adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of manufacture

If the handle surface portion has a smooth structure without depressions or elevations to meet hygiene regulations, then manufacturing is simplified and cleaning is easier, but grip security deteriorates causing slipping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface structure simplicityVSAvoidgrip security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the smooth handle surface into multiple discrete rounded enclosures distributed across the handle surface. This segmentation provides grip-enhancing features without creating continuous complex structures, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while improving grip security through distributed mechanical interlocking points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces controlled surface geometry changes with specific radius ratios and enclosure dimensions that optimize grip while maintaining manufacturability. The parameters are chosen to balance the complexity of surface structure with the need for effective grip, resolving the contradiction between smooth simple surfaces and grip-enhancing features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The hexagonal edge structure enhances grip security, reduces glove damage risk, and facilitates efficient cleaning and sterilization by distributing force evenly and preventing liquid accumulation, thereby improving user safety and instrument hygiene.

Implementation Method 1

the force which is applied to the handle surface portion by the surgeon's hand, in particular by the surgeon's thumb, is distributed by the arrangement according to the invention essentially evenly over the entire arrangement and in particular over all enclosure portions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce distribution:

Implementation Method 2

the hexagonal edge structure enhances grip security, reduces glove damage risk, and facilitates efficient cleaning and sterilization by distributing force evenly and preventing liquid accumulation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeometric prevention of liquid accumulation:

Implementation Method 3

the handle surface portion has to be configured such that the handle surface portion in contact with the glove enclosing the surgeon's hand allows the application of a high frictional force without the glove slipping on the handle surface portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10238410B2Medical instrument
Publication Date: 2019.03.26 S&T AG(CH)
  • US10238410B2 patent drawing
  • US10238410B2 patent drawing
  • US10238410B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A medical instrument, in particular a surgical instrument, with an intervention portion (20) for a medical intervention, and with a grip (14) designed for holding the instrument, preferably for actuating the intervention portion, with a grip surface portion (1) which is made of a stainless metal and which has an arrangement with shapings (0) and, formed between the shapings, enclosure portions (4, 5, 6, 7), characterized in that the shapings (0) each have a hexagonal edge (2) with six edge portions of equal length (3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 3-4, 3-5, 3-6), wherein mutually adjoining edge portions (3-1, 3-2; 3-2, 3-3; . . . ) of each shaping (0) upstream and/or downstream of a winding of the arrangement on a plane surface span the same angle (φ) of 120 degrees, and wherein the edge (2) is formed by the enclosure portions (4, 5, 6, 7) formed between adjacent shapings (0), as a result of which a honeycomb structure (9) is obtained.