Hexagonal Honeycomb Helmet Shell with Reinforced End Caps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Helmets for sporting use face challenges in balancing lightweight construction, impact absorption, airflow, comfort, and aesthetic considerations, particularly with traditional EPS molding techniques, which compromise mechanical properties and safety due to issues like crumpling, knife-like walls, and crack propagation when holes are introduced for ventilation.

Innovation Solution

The use of a hexagonal honeycomb structure with cylindrical or elliptical end caps for reinforcement, integrated columns at intersections, and constant-force pads with springs to enhance 3D printability and structural integrity while maintaining airflow, incorporating additive manufacturing techniques like FDM to create a lightweight yet robust helmet shell.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional EPS molding techniques are used to create helmet shells with ventilation holes, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but mechanical properties deteriorate due to crumpling, knife-like walls, and crack propagation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidmechanical properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The helmet shell is divided into multiple hexagonal tubes arranged in a honeycomb pattern, where each tube acts as an independent structural unit. This segmentation allows ventilation holes to be created within individual tubes without compromising the overall structural integrity, as the failure of one tube does not propagate to adjacent tubes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite structure combining hexagonal tube geometry with specific material properties. The tubes are designed with optimized wall thicknesses and geometries that provide both ventilation functionality and mechanical strength, creating a composite structure that overcomes the limitations of traditional EPS molding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of operation

If ventilation holes are introduced in traditional EPS helmets, then airflow is improved, but structural integrity worsens due to crack propagation and knife-like walls

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveairflowVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Ventilation holes are integrated into the hexagonal tube structure itself, where each tube serves as both a structural element and a ventilation channel. This eliminates the need to cut holes through the shell, preventing crack propagation and knife-like wall formation while maintaining airflow through the tube lumens.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hexagonal tube geometry provides curved, continuous walls without sharp knife-like edges. The rounded corners and smooth transitions in the tube structure prevent stress concentration and crack initiation, while the hexagonal cross-section optimizes both structural strength and airflow characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Weight of moving object

If the helmet shell is made lightweight, then comfort is improved, but impact absorption capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehelmet weightVSAvoidimpact absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The honeycomb arrangement of hexagonal tubes creates a lightweight lattice structure that provides high strength-to-weight ratio. The segmented tube design allows material to be distributed optimally throughout the shell, providing impact absorption through the collective resistance of multiple tubes while minimizing overall material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The honeycomb structure inherently creates a porous, cellular architecture that provides excellent energy absorption characteristics. The void spaces within the hexagonal tubes and between adjacent tubes allow for controlled deformation during impact, dissipating energy while maintaining low weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Data Source

PatentUS20230119234A1Helmet structures and methods
Publication Date: 2023.04.20 ZAM HELMETS INC
  • US20230119234A1 patent drawing
  • US20230119234A1 patent drawing
  • US20230119234A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A personal protective item, such as a helmet, includes a substrate formed of a hexagonal structure comprising a plurality of hexagonal tubes, each hexagon tube having a first end and a second end and being formed by a plurality of walls, the first and second ends being defined by edges of the plurality of walls. A cylindrical end cap is provided on at least some of the edges of the plurality of walls. The personal protective item may further comprise supporting columns along the hexagonal tubes where the walls of adjacent hexagonal tubes meet. A pad for providing user comfort may also be provide., the pad comprising a plate that is deflectable relative to a substrate of the personal protective time, the pad being coupled to the substrate by one or more constant force springs. Parts of the protective item may be joined using splines and grooves.