Security Element Hexagonal Microcavity Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security elements for valuable documents, such as banknotes, face limitations in size and manufacturing complexity due to moiré enlargement requirements, which affect the size and detail of microimages, and struggle to provide strong contrast without increasing production effort.

Innovation Solution

A security element featuring a microcavity structure with non-orthogonal, hexagonally arranged microcavities of 0.5 to 3 μm aperture width, coated to produce a color effect, which enhances contrast and resolution by varying brightness and diffractive properties based on viewing direction, allowing for high-resolution motifs without complex printing processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If microcavities are arranged in a regular orthogonal grid pattern, then manufacturing is simplified, but the contrast and resolution of microimages deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidmicroimage resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by transitioning from a conventional orthogonal grid arrangement to a hexagonal arrangement of microcavities. This asymmetric change in geometric pattern enhances the optical properties and contrast of microimages while maintaining manufacturability through standard embossing techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameter of the microcavity arrangement from orthogonal to hexagonal. This parameter change in the spatial configuration improves the optical performance and image resolution without compromising the ease of manufacturing, as hexagonal patterns can still be produced using conventional embossing methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If microcavity aperture size is increased, then manufacturing precision improves, but the area available for high-resolution motifs decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrocavity definitionVSAvoidmicroimage area
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the contradiction by optimizing the depth dimension of microcavities while maintaining small aperture widths. By varying the depth (z-dimension) rather than increasing aperture size, the patent achieves high manufacturing precision and strong optical contrast without sacrificing the lateral area available for microimage motifs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating variations in microcavity depth across different regions to form images. Different depths provide different optical properties (reflective vs. non-reflective), enabling high-resolution imaging with small apertures while maintaining sufficient lateral area for motifs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If complex printing processes are used to achieve strong contrast, then microimage quality improves, but production complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrast qualityVSAvoidproduction process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex printing processes with a mechanical embossing system that creates three-dimensional microcavity structures. This substitution achieves strong contrast through optical effects from the 3D geometry rather than through complex multi-step printing, thereby simplifying the production process while maintaining high image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from two-dimensional printing to three-dimensional structuring. By varying the depth parameter of microcavities, the patent achieves strong contrast and high-quality images using a single embossing step rather than complex printing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Illumination intensity

If microcavity depth is increased, then optical contrast improves, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical contrastVSAvoiddepth control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using moderate depth variations rather than uniformly deep microcavities. By optimizing depth to provide sufficient optical contrast without excessive depth, the patent achieves good contrast while maintaining reasonable manufacturing precision requirements within the 0.5-3 μm aperture range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides strong contrast and high-resolution microimages that are difficult to reproduce, even without magnification, while simplifying production and maintaining optical effectiveness across various viewing angles, thus enhancing security against forgery.

Implementation Method 1

a microcavity structure being provided which has a plurality of microcavities lying next to one another in a regular pattern, wherein the microcavities each have an aperture width of 0.5 μm to 3 μm when viewed in a spatial direction parallel to the top, a coating that produces a color effect is provided over the microcavity structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Implementation Method 2

The microcavities have an aperture size between 0.5 μm and 3 μm along the top and are optically reflective or highly refractive on their surface, so that at least partial reflection takes place on the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

a coating that produces a color effect is provided over the microcavity structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical interference: Interference

Data Source

PatentEP2927715B1Safety element for security papers, valuable documents or the like
Publication Date: 2018.02.14 GIESECKE & DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH
  • EP2927715B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2927715B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2927715B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a security element for the production of valuable documents, such as banknotes, checks or the like, which has a top surface that provides a micro-image (12), wherein a microcavity structure (1) is provided which has a plurality of adjacent microcavities (3) arranged in a regular pattern (14), wherein the microcavities (3) each have an aperture width of 0.5 µm to 3 µm when viewed in a spatial direction parallel to the top surface, and a coating (15; 19.1, 19.2) producing a color effect is provided over the microcavity structure (1), wherein the pattern (14) of the microcavities (3) in a top view has the form of a non-orthogonal, two-dimensional grid type.