Hexagonal Qubit Lattice Layout for Reduced Frequency Collisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quantum computers face challenges in reducing frequency collisions during gate operations, which leads to unusable qubits and low yield of good chips, and existing systems fail to effectively encode quantum information while minimizing these collisions.

Innovation Solution

A quantum computer with a hexagonal lattice pattern of qubits, where each qubit is strategically positioned at the apex or edge of the hexagon, and error correction mechanisms are implemented to detect and correct phase flip and bit flip errors using X-type and Z-type gauge measurements, reducing the probability of frequency collisions by optimizing qubit frequencies and interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If qubits are arranged in conventional error-correction lattices, then error correction can be performed, but frequency collisions occur during gate operations reducing chip yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoidchip yield
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The qubit lattice is segmented into two distinct types: degree-2 qubits (with two neighbors) and degree-3 qubits (with three neighbors). This segmentation allows assignment of different frequencies to different qubit types, where degree-2 qubits operate at frequency f1 and degree-3 qubits operate at frequency f2. By dividing the lattice into these segments, frequency collisions are avoided while maintaining error correction functionality through the stabilized code structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If quantum information is encoded to reduce errors from gate operations and noise, then error correction improves, but the complexity of encoding and frequency management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoidencoding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different qubits are assigned different roles and frequencies based on their local properties in the lattice. Degree-2 qubits are assigned frequency f1 and serve as one type of logical qubit, while degree-3 qubits are assigned frequency f2 and serve as another type. This local differentiation simplifies the encoding scheme compared to uniform approaches, as the frequency assignment naturally follows from the qubit's position and connectivity in the lattice structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12093789B2Quantum code for reduced frequency collisions in qubit lattices
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12093789B2 patent drawing
  • US12093789B2 patent drawing
  • US12093789B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A quantum computer includes a quantum processor that includes a first plurality of qubits arranged in a hexagonal lattice pattern such that each is substantially located at a hexagon apex, and a second plurality of qubits each arranged substantially along a hexagon edge. Each of the first plurality of qubits is coupled to three nearest-neighbor qubits of the second plurality of qubits, and each of the second plurality of qubits is coupled to two nearest-neighbor qubits of the first plurality of qubits. Each of the second plurality of qubits is a control qubit at a control frequency. Each of the first plurality of qubits is a target qubit at one of a first target frequency or a second target frequency. The quantum computer includes an error correction device configured to operate on the hexagonal lattice pattern of the plurality of qubits so as to detect and correct data errors.