Hexagonal Stator Lamination Segmentation for Scrap Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing large rotor/stator laminations result in significant material scrap and lower quality due to the need for segmented production and complex assembly processes, particularly for larger stators and rotors.

Innovation Solution

A method involving slitting electrical steel into a material strip with a width corresponding to half the outer diameter, making slant cuts to form trapezoids, joining them to create hexagons, and then stamping the laminations, which reduces material waste and simplifies assembly by using fewer segments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If material is slit and sheared into multiple segments to produce large stator laminations, then the lamination can be produced in standard equipment, but material scrap increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduciability in standard equipmentVSAvoidmaterial scrap
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the large stator lamination into multiple segments that can be produced in standard equipment. The key innovation is using a hexagonal geometry where segments are arranged to minimize scrap while maintaining manufacturability in conventional presses with limited stroke capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional rectangular segment layouts to a hexagonal geometric arrangement. This dimensional change in the overall lamination shape allows for more efficient material utilization and reduced scrap when cutting segments from the parent material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If multiple lamination segments are assembled and welded to form large stators, then production can proceed with available equipment, but assembly complexity and labor increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduciability with available equipmentVSAvoidassembly process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stator is divided into multiple segments that can be manufactured separately in standard equipment with limited stroke capacity. These segments are then assembled and welded together to form the complete large stator lamination, enabling production beyond equipment limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal assembly process that can handle different stator sizes and configurations using the same segment assembly and welding methodology. The hexagonal segment design provides a standardized interface that simplifies the assembly process across various applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If rotor slots are added after punching the rotor blank, then slot precision can be achieved, but the number of processing steps increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslot precisionVSAvoidnumber of processing steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor slots are punched into the rotor blank before the final assembly and welding operations. This preliminary action ensures that slots are precisely positioned and formed early in the process, allowing subsequent operations to proceed without interference and maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple operations including blank punching, slot punching, and assembly into an integrated workflow. By performing slot punching while the rotor blank is still accessible and in a stable state, the process reduces the total number of separate processing steps while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Loss of substance

If electrical steel is slit to exact width requirements for each component, then material utilization improves, but the number of slitting operations and setup changes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial utilizationVSAvoidnumber of slitting operations
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a universal parent material size that can serve multiple purposes - producing both stator and rotor segments, and accommodating different lamination sizes. This reduces the need for frequent slitting operation changes while maintaining good material utilization through the hexagonal segment layout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the lamination from traditional rectangular shapes to hexagonal shapes. This parameter change allows for more flexible material utilization and reduces the impact of fixed slitting widths, as the hexagonal geometry can be efficiently cut from various parent material sizes with less waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8082654B2Production method for large rotor/stator laminations
Publication Date: 2011.12.27 PNC BANK NA
  • US8082654B2 patent drawing
  • US8082654B2 patent drawing
  • US8082654B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method for manufacturing a lamination for a motor or generator where a plurality of the laminations are used to form a core of the motor or generator, a material strip of electrical steel is provided having a width substantially corresponding to half of an outer diameter of the lamination to be created. Slant cuts are made along the material strip to form trapezoids of substantially a same area. Two of the trapezoids are joined together along a side edge of each to form a hexagon. The lamination is then stamped from the hexagon.