HFOV Closed Loop Control for Piston Centering and MAP

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing high frequency oscillatory ventilator (HFOV) control systems face inaccuracies in mean airway pressure (MAP) and piston movement due to open loop control methods, leading to suboptimal patient ventilation and potential complications, as they fail to accurately control pressure oscillations and maintain piston centering.

Innovation Solution

A closed loop control system utilizing separate feedback controllers for piston movement and MAP, combining patient circuit pressure and piston position feedback to regulate piston motion and exhalation valve control, ensuring accurate centering and decoupling of pressure oscillations from MAP control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If open loop control methods are used in HFOV systems, then device complexity is reduced, but control accuracy of pressure oscillations and piston movement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidpressure oscillation control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop control system that uses feedback from pressure sensors and piston position sensors to continuously monitor and adjust the HFOV operation. The microprocessor compares actual pressure oscillations and piston position against desired values and makes real-time corrections, ensuring accurate control of pressure oscillations and piston centering while maintaining manageable system complexity through integrated feedback mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If separate feedback controllers are implemented for piston movement and MAP, then control accuracy of pressure oscillations improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepiston movement control accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distinct functional controllers: a piston position feedback controller that independently manages piston centering and movement, and a MAP feedback controller that independently manages mean airway pressure. This segmentation allows each controller to be optimized for its specific function, improving control accuracy while the modular architecture keeps overall system complexity manageable through clear separation of control responsibilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If piston amplitude is increased to provide optimal ventilation, then tidal volume delivery improves, but control difficulty increases due to airway resistance variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetidal volume deliveryVSAvoidpiston control difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The piston position feedback controller continuously monitors piston position and amplitude, comparing against desired values and making real-time adjustments to maintain optimal tidal volume delivery. The system automatically compensates for variations in airway resistance by adjusting piston amplitude dynamically, eliminating the need for manual intervention and simplifying operation while ensuring consistent ventilation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves stable and accurate control of pressure oscillations and MAP, maximizing piston amplitude and responsiveness to changes, thereby improving patient ventilation efficacy and reducing the risk of complications.

Implementation Method 1

The piston may be driven by a linear motor powered by a square-wave driver which induces rapid reciprocation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLinear motor: Linear Motor

Implementation Method 2

a square-wave driver which induces rapid reciprocation caused by switching of the polarity of the square-wave driver between positive and negative values

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

The piston is adapted to rapidly move an elastic diaphragm at the desired frequency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2954917B1High frequency oscillation ventilator with a closed loop control system
Publication Date: 2018.02.07 CAREFUSION 205 INC
  • EP2954917B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2954917B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A high frequency oscillating ventilator (HFOV) comprising a control system which includes an oscillator controller and a mean airway pressure (MAP) controller. The HFOV includes a reciprocating piston which is adapted to generate positive and negative pressure waves for delivery to a patient airway. The oscillator controller comprises a pair of closed loop control circuits including an oscillator pressure loop and a centering loop which are collectively adapted to regulate frequency and amplitude of piston reciprocations and centering of the piston about a mid-stroke position of the piston. The MAP controller comprises a closed loop control circuit that is adapted for regulating MAP at the patient utilizing feedback in the form of patient circuit pressure. Likewise, the oscillator controller utilizes patient circuit pressure as well as piston displacement feedback in order to regulate movement of the piston.