HFTO Mitigation Mechanism for Downhole Drilling Node Relocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High frequency torsional oscillations (HFTO) in downhole drilling systems cause structural damage and reduce drilling efficiency due to unaddressed node locations and conventional energy damping systems' ineffectiveness at nodes with high strain but low displacement.

Innovation Solution

Identifying and modifying the downhole system to move oscillation nodes away from sensitive components by installing HFTO mitigation mechanisms, such as wear bands or sleeves, to alter contact regions with the wellbore wall, reducing contact length and friction, thereby changing the oscillation node location and reducing torsional strain.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional energy damping systems are used to reduce vibrations, then vibration amplitude is reduced, but the systems are ineffective at oscillation nodes with high strain but low displacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of vibration mitigationVSAvoidtorsional strain at oscillation nodes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the harmful oscillation node from its original location by introducing a mitigation mechanism that separates the node from sensitive components. The oscillation node is effectively 'removed' from the critical area by relocating it to a safer position along the drill string, thereby eliminating the harmful effect without requiring the node to be damped conventionaly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dimensional change by moving the oscillation node along the axial dimension (length of drill string) rather than attempting to damp vibrations in the torsional dimension. By relocating the node to a different position along the string, the system transforms the problem from a vibration amplitude issue to a spatial positioning issue, where the node is placed away from sensitive components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the oscillation node location is not addressed, then drilling operation continues, but structural damage and fatigue occur to drilling tools

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling efficiencyVSAvoidstructural integrity of drilling tools
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by identifying the oscillation node location through modeling before the drilling operation begins. The mitigation mechanism is designed and positioned in advance to preemptively protect against torsional strain and fatigue, preventing structural damage before it occurs during actual drilling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mitigation mechanism (such as a wear band or sleeve) between the oscillation node and sensitive drilling components. This intermediary element absorbs or redistributes the torsional strain, acting as a protective buffer that prevents direct damage to the drilling tools while allowing the drilling operation to continue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of energy

If energy damping systems are installed, then vibration energy is dissipated, but the systems add complexity to the downhole assembly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration energy dissipationVSAvoidcomplexity of downhole assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the need for complex energy damping systems by addressing the root cause of vibration damage through node relocation. Instead of installing comprehensive damping systems that would dissipate vibration energy, the simpler approach of moving the oscillation node away from sensitive components eliminates the harmful effects without requiring extensive energy dissipation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the conventional approach to vibration mitigation. Rather than attempting to damp or dissipate vibration energy through complex systems, the invention inverts the strategy by focusing on spatial relocation of the oscillation node. This inversion simplifies the solution from energy-based damping to position-based protection, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS20220403731A1Devices, systems, and methods for high frequency oscillation mitigation
Publication Date: 2022.12.22 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US20220403731A1 patent drawing
  • US20220403731A1 patent drawing
  • US20220403731A1 patent drawing

AI summary

High frequency oscillation (HFO) comes in at least two types. Type 1 HFO is lower frequency and often associated with a motor. Type 2 HFO is higher frequency and often independent of a motor. To mitigate torsional strain due to Type 2 HFO, an HFO mitigation mechanism can be placed based on an oscillation node location to move the oscillation node to a new position which may be uphole of a tool or the BHA, or to a less vulnerable location. Mitigation can also include placing an energy damping component based on the oscillation node. This may be at a high displacement location distanced from the oscillation node, or may include placement at the oscillation node with an additional HFO mitigation mechanism to move the oscillation node away from the installation location. Oscillations may be damped by using any combination of flow restrictions, fluid bypasses, or axially compliant elements.