Horizontal Gate All Around Isolation via Buried Oxide Formation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for forming horizontal gate all around (hGAA) and fin field effect transistor (FinFET) device structures face challenges with parasitic capacitance and leakage, as dopant implantation can hinder epitaxial growth and may not adequately reduce parasitic effects, and thermal oxidation processes exceed the thermal budgets of stacked lattice matched channels.

Innovation Solution

A superlattice structure comprising silicon and silicon germanium layers with varying germanium content is formed on a substrate, where the higher germanium content layers are oxidized to create a buried oxide layer, enhancing device isolation and reducing parasitic leakage and capacitance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dopant implantation is used to suppress parasitic leakage, then leakage is reduced, but epitaxial growth is hindered and device variability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparasitic leakage suppressionVSAvoidepitaxial growth
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the dopant implantation step from the process and replaces it with in-situ doped silicon germanium layer deposition. This removes the harmful effect of dopant implantation on epitaxial growth while maintaining the beneficial effect of dopant presence for leakage suppression. The dopants are introduced during the epitaxial growth process itself rather than through subsequent implantation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the method of dopant introduction from post-growth implantation to in-situ incorporation during epitaxial growth. This parameter change in the doping process allows dopants to be uniformly distributed without disrupting the epitaxial structure, resolving the contradiction between leakage suppression and growth quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If thermal oxidation is used to treat parasitic devices, then parasitic effects are reduced, but temperatures exceed the thermal budget of stacked lattice matched channels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparasitic effects reductionVSAvoidthermal budget
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the need for high-temperature thermal oxidation by preventing parasitic device formation in the first place through selective layer removal and buried oxide formation. This eliminates the requirement for subsequent high-temperature treatments that would exceed the thermal budget of the stacked channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions during the epitaxial growth process itself - forming buried oxide layers and selectively removing sacrificial layers - to prevent parasitic device formation before it occurs. This preliminary prevention avoids the need for later high-temperature thermal oxidation treatments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional isolation methods are used, then device isolation is achieved, but parasitic capacitance and leakage are not adequately reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice isolationVSAvoidparasitic capacitance and leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite material structures - specifically alternating layers of silicon and silicon germanium with different germanium contents - to achieve both isolation and parasitic reduction. The buried oxide layers formed from high-germanium silicon germanium provide electrical isolation, while the graded germanium composition manages stress and reduces parasitic effects throughout the structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by varying the germanium content in different silicon germanium layers - lower germanium content (20-40%) in some layers and higher germanium content (50-80%) in others. This local variation in material composition allows different regions to serve different functions: stress management, selective oxidation for buried oxide formation, and parasitic reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a substantially defect-free stacked channel structure, increasing circuit density, reducing parasitic leakage and capacitance, and lowering power consumption while maintaining geometric benefits in current density per square micrometer.

Implementation Method 1

the higher germanium content SiGe layers are oxidized to form buried oxide (BOX) layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS11145761B2Horizontal gate all around and FinFET device isolation
Publication Date: 2021.10.12 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US11145761B2 patent drawing
  • US11145761B2 patent drawing
  • US11145761B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments described herein generally relate to methods and device structures for horizontal gate all around (hGAA) isolation and fin field effect transistor (FinFET) isolation. A superlattice structure comprising different materials arranged in an alternatingly stacked formation may be formed on a substrate. In one embodiment, at least one of the layers of the superlattice structure may be oxidized to form a buried oxide layer adjacent the substrate.