Hidden Image Security Printing on Transparent Substrates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current security documents, particularly banknotes made of plastic substrates, face challenges in incorporating effective safety features like multitone watermarks and windowed security threads due to their material properties, making them vulnerable to counterfeiting.

Innovation Solution

A method for printing a security item on a transparent substrate where a first part of an image is printed on one side and a complementary part on the opposite side, both in register, using ink with different reflectivity than the substrate, allowing the image to be invisible at a perpendicular view but distinguishable when viewed at an angle, enhancing security against counterfeiting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of stationary object

If plastic substrate is used for banknotes, then durability and lifespan are improved, but effectiveness of security features like watermarks and security threads deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifespan of banknoteVSAvoideffectiveness of security features
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The security feature is divided into two complementary parts: a first part printed on the front side of the transparent substrate and a second part printed on the back side. When viewed in transmission, both parts combine to form a complete security feature (such as a watermark or security thread), while in reflection only the first part is visible. This segmentation allows plastic banknotes to achieve security feature effectiveness comparable to paper banknotes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Illumination intensity

If image is printed on transparent substrate with same reflectivity, then visibility and aesthetic quality are improved, but detectability of security feature deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisibility of imageVSAvoiddetectability of security feature
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The ink used for printing the first part of the security feature has different reflectivity properties than the transparent substrate. Specifically, the ink has lower reflectivity in the visible spectrum, creating a visual contrast that makes the security feature detectable when viewed in reflection, while maintaining aesthetic quality and visibility when viewed in transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly improves the security level of documents by making them difficult to counterfeit and easy to verify, while being compatible with existing printing presses and capable of integration with other security features.

Implementation Method 1

using ink with different reflectivity than the substrate, allowing the image to be invisible at a perpendicular view but distinguishable when viewed at an angle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP1886827B1Hidden image
Publication Date: 2009.12.23 NAT BANK OF BELGIUM
  • EP1886827B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP1886827B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP1886827B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

The invention relates to a new method for printing a security item on a substrate of which at least a part is made of a transparent material, a first part (3) of an image (2) being printed on one side of the transparent material, and a second complementary part (4) of the image (2) being printed on the opposite side of the transparent material such that, at at least some angles (P°) of view, the image (2) is visible or can be visualised as a whole in which the first (3) and second (4) part of the image (2) are not distinguishable.