Hierarchical Accelerator Scheduling for Die Size and Complexity Tradeoffs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Scheduling tasks in a heterogeneous computing environment is challenging due to conflicting considerations of die size and scheduling complexity, leading to under-utilization of accelerator resources.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a hierarchical task scheduler with a coarse scheduling circuit module and fine scheduling circuit modules to partition and schedule tasks efficiently, optimizing for makespan and supporting diverse accelerator technologies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of moving object

If tasks are partitioned into fine-grained sub-tasks to reduce die size, then die size is reduced, but scheduling complexity increases exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedie sizeVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the scheduling problem into two hierarchical levels: coarse-grained task scheduling at the apex level and fine-grained sub-task scheduling at the accelerator level. This multi-level segmentation allows the system to manage fine-grained tasks without encountering exponential scheduling complexity at a single level, as each level handles a different granularity of tasks independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension to the scheduling problem by adding an apex level above the traditional single-level scheduler. This dimensional change transforms the problem from a two-dimensional scheduling challenge into a three-dimensional hierarchical structure, allowing fine-grained tasks to be managed through layered abstraction without exponential complexity increase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If large tasks are scheduled to reduce scheduling complexity, then scheduling complexity is reduced, but memory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling complexityVSAvoidmemory requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments tasks into coarse-grained tasks for apex-level scheduling and fine-grained sub-tasks for accelerator-level execution. This segmentation allows the system to maintain lower memory requirements at each level while avoiding exponential scheduling complexity, as the apex level manages fewer large tasks and accelerators handle smaller sub-tasks with localized memory needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If the number of accelerators is increased to improve performance, then computing performance is improved, but die size becomes prohibitive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing performanceVSAvoiddie size
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a hierarchical dimension to the accelerator architecture by introducing an apex level that coordinates multiple accelerators. This dimensional change allows the system to scale performance across multiple accelerators without requiring each accelerator to have proportionally larger die size, as the hierarchical structure enables efficient resource sharing and task distribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12430166B2Hierarchical task scheduling for accelerators
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 UT BATTELLE LLC
  • US12430166B2 patent drawing
  • US12430166B2 patent drawing
  • US12430166B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods are disclosed for scheduling tasks in a heterogeneous computing environment. Coarse scheduling of a received task-set is performed centrally, with tasks dispatched to respective processing resources including one or more accelerators. At each accelerator, sub-tasks of a received task are identified, scheduled, and executed. Data-transfer and computation sub-tasks can be pipelined. The accelerator operates using small tiles of local data, which are transferred to or from a large shared reservoir of main memory. Sub-task scheduling can be customized to each accelerator; coarse task scheduling can work on larger tasks; both can be efficient. Simulations demonstrate large improvements in makespan and/or circuit area. Disclosed technologies are scalable and can be implemented in varying combinations of hard-wired or software modules. These technologies are widely applicable to high-performance computing, image classification, media processing, wireless coding, encryption, and other fields.