Hierarchical Composite via Laser Cooling Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The production of real-life size parts from bulk metallic glass is challenging due to high cooling rate requirements, and existing hierarchical composite materials tend to be brittle, lacking ductility while maintaining high fatigue resistance and elastic modulus.

Innovation Solution

An additive manufacturing method utilizing laser powder bed fusion with in-situ control of local cooling rates through modeling and a cryogenic cooling system to produce hierarchical inhomogeneous composite materials with variable mechanical properties, incorporating alternating hard-soft zones and hybrid structures with crystalline grains in an amorphous matrix.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If bulk metallic glass is used to produce real-life size parts, then excellent elastic modulus is achieved, but high cooling rate requirements make production challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelastic modulusVSAvoidproduction feasibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The component is divided into multiple regions with different cooling rates, creating a hierarchical structure with amorphous regions (for elastic modulus) and crystalline grain regions (for ductility). This segmentation allows different parts of the component to have different microstructures optimized for their specific functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the component are assigned different local properties through controlled cooling rates. Some regions maintain amorphous structure for high elastic modulus, while other regions develop crystalline grains for ductility. This local quality variation resolves the contradiction by allowing the component to have both high strength and manufacturability in different locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If hierarchical composite materials are used to accommodate plastic strain, then ductility is improved, but the materials tend to be brittle

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveductilityVSAvoidbrittleness resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a composite-like hierarchical structure within a single material system, combining amorphous matrix regions with crystalline grain regions. The amorphous regions provide ductility and plastic strain accommodation, while the crystalline regions maintain strength and fatigue resistance, effectively resolving the brittleness-ductility contradiction through microstructural composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Adaptability or versatility

If in-situ control of local cooling rate is implemented during additive manufacturing, then location-specific properties are achieved, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation-specific propertiesVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling rate is made dynamic and controllable during the additive manufacturing process. By adjusting cooling rates in real-time for different regions, the process achieves location-specific properties. This dynamic control, while increasing process complexity, enables the versatile production of components with spatially varying microstructures and properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the production of components with enhanced ductility and fatigue resistance while maintaining high elastic modulus, achieving location-specific properties and reducing defects, suitable for applications in aerostructures and naval components.

Implementation Method 1

additive manufacturing comprises laser powder bed fusion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 2

laser powder bed fusion with in-situ control of local cooling rates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

cryogenic cooling system internally installed in a laser powder bed machine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConductive cooling: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 4

in-situ controlling of a local cooling rate during the additive manufacturing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Implementation Method 5

phase field model for microstructure prediction and customization

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 6

solidification map prediction models

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Crystallisation

Data Source

PatentUS20240416424A1Additive manufacturing method for production of hierarchical design optimized composite materials
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 RTX CORP
  • US20240416424A1 patent drawing
  • US20240416424A1 patent drawing
  • US20240416424A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides improved additive manufacturing methods and systems. More particularly, the present disclosure provides advantageous additive manufacturing methods and systems for the production of hierarchical design optimized components (e.g., composite or composite-like materials). The present disclosure provides a methodology to produce hierarchical design optimized additively manufactured parts/materials that include an inhomogeneous structure with variable local mechanical properties across the entire volume. Hierarchical inhomogeneous structure/composite materials can be produced through a laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process. A novel LPBF method can be used to obtain location-specific properties through in-situ controlling of the local cooling rate during the additive manufacturing process.