Hierarchical Conflict Analysis for Faster Client Intake Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing client intake systems rely heavily on personal knowledge and require significant human intervention and time for conflict checks, often taking 24 hours and using large databases.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for client intake and management that utilizes a central server and user terminals to automatically process initial client data, retrieve additional data from databases and third-party sources, generate risk parameters, and determine conflict ratings using hierarchical searching, reducing the need for human intervention and accelerating the process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing conflict check systems use large databases and manual review processes, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but loss of time and productivity deteriorate significantly

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveconflict check accuracyVSAvoidconflict check duration

Core Design Contradiction:

Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the conflict check process into distinct phases: initial data collection from multiple sources, hierarchical data processing (primary, secondary, tertiary levels), and automated conflict identification. This segmentation allows the system to process large databases efficiently by breaking down the complex task into manageable stages, reducing overall processing time while maintaining comprehensive accuracy

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review processes with automated electronic data processing. The system automatically retrieves data from multiple sources, processes it through hierarchical algorithms, and generates conflict reports without human intervention, dramatically reducing the time required while maintaining or improving accuracy through consistent automated application of conflict criteria

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual review and research processes are used for client intake, then reliability of risk assessment is improved, but device complexity and ease of operation worsen

Engineering Contradiction:

Improverisk assessment reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal system that performs multiple functions: data retrieval from various sources, hierarchical data processing, conflict analysis, risk parameter generation, and report generation. This multi-functional automated system replaces multiple separate manual processes, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining reliable risk assessment through comprehensive automated analysis

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically retrieving data, processing information, identifying conflicts, and generating reports without requiring human intervention. The automated hierarchical processing and conflict detection algorithms independently complete the entire risk assessment workflow, maintaining reliability while simplifying operation to basic data input and report retrieval

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive data retrieval from multiple sources is performed, then measurement precision improves, but use of energy and processing power increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improverisk parameter accuracyVSAvoidprocessing power consumption

Core Design Contradiction:

Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by establishing hierarchical data processing levels before full analysis. The system first performs a quick primary-level check, then selectively performs secondary and tertiary level processing only when needed. This preliminary filtering reduces unnecessary processing of comprehensive data from all sources, lowering energy consumption while maintaining measurement precision when conflicts are actually present

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by retrieving and processing only the necessary portion of available data based on the specific case requirements. The hierarchical approach allows the system to perform minimal necessary data retrieval for routine cases while automatically escalating to more comprehensive data collection only when initial analysis indicates potential conflicts, optimizing energy usage relative to the precision needed

Inventive Principle:

Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12579493B2Systems and methods for client intake and management using hierarchical conflict analysis

Publication Date: 2026.03.17 ACI HLDG LTD

AI summary

Systems and methods for client intake and management are disclosed herein. In an embodiment, a method for client intake and management by a first party includes receiving initial client data regarding a second party from at least one user terminal, the initial client data including a name of the second party and at least one selection, determining a conflict rating using hierarchical searching on a matter database using the initial client data and the at least one selection, and causing an adjustment to a user interface on a user terminal based on the conflict rating.