Hierarchical Control for Low Voltage Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for regulating low and medium-voltage networks face challenges in managing large data volumes and computing power, leading to a significant reduction in data exchange, which results in unused regulatory potential and potential losses during control unit failures.

Innovation Solution

A method where at least two sub-networks of a main network are assigned a lower control unit, with an upper control unit evaluating the main network state and issuing change commands to selected lower control units, distributing control effort decentralization, allowing comprehensive control of low and medium-voltage networks without sacrificing smaller network participant control potential.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If control is extended to medium-voltage networks with comprehensive data collection, then control potential and regulatory capability are improved, but data volume and computing power requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol potentialVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple hierarchical levels (upper control unit for medium-voltage network, lower control units for low-voltage networks). Each level processes data locally and only exchanges essential summarized information with higher levels, reducing overall data volume while maintaining comprehensive control capability across the entire network hierarchy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Lower control units act as intermediaries between individual actuators/sensors and the upper control unit. They aggregate and summarize data from multiple low-voltage network participants before transmission to the upper control unit, reducing the data burden on the medium-voltage network control while preserving detailed control potential at the distribution level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If all network participants are monitored and controlled individually, then regulatory precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into hierarchical levels with specialized functions. Lower control units handle individual participant monitoring and control at the network edge, while the upper control unit focuses on overall medium-voltage network regulation. This segmentation maintains precise individual control without requiring a single complex centralized system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Lower control units autonomously manage their respective low-voltage networks, making local control decisions and regulating their network participants independently. This self-service capability at the distribution level eliminates the need for complex centralized control of every individual participant, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining regulatory precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Stability of the object's composition

If centralized control is used for medium-voltage networks, then control coordination is improved, but reliability decreases due to single point of failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol coordinationVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control function is segmented across multiple independent control units distributed at different hierarchical levels. The upper control unit coordinates medium-voltage network control, while lower control units independently manage low-voltage networks. This segmentation creates redundancy, so if one control unit fails, others can continue operating, maintaining both coordination and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the control system have specialized local capabilities. Lower control units possess local intelligence to autonomously regulate their respective low-voltage networks without requiring constant upper control unit intervention. This local quality ensures continued operation and maintains control coordination even when upper control communication is disrupted, improving overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3168949B1Method and device for the decentral regulation of low voltage and medium voltage networks
Publication Date: 2020.07.01 SAG
  • EP3168949B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3168949B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

In a method for controlling low- and medium-voltage networks, at least two subnetworks (1) of a main network (2) are each assigned at least one lower control unit (3). An upper control unit (4) is assigned to the main network (2), which is a medium- or low-voltage network. The subnetworks (1) are low-voltage networks or low-voltage network sections. The lower control units (3) are each connected to a plurality of lower actuators (5), which can change the state of the respective subnetwork (1). The lower control units (3) aggregate data from their respective lower actuators (5), and this aggregated data is transmitted from the lower control units (3) to the upper control unit (4).