Hierarchical Conditional Random Field for Image Labeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional image labeling techniques fail to provide sufficient scalability and performance for simultaneously segmenting and labeling images based on their content, which is crucial for applications like content-based retrieval and object recognition.

Innovation Solution

A hierarchical classification model is employed, combining global and local classification models to determine pixel-by-pixel labels in images, using both parametric and non-parametric techniques, where the global model learns relationships between image features and labels, and local models are trained for clusters of images with similar features, enhancing scalability and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional labeling techniques are used, then the system is simple to implement, but scalability and performance are insufficient for large datasets

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the image labeling system into hierarchical levels: global classification models that process entire images to generate initial labels, and local classification models that refine labels for specific regions or objects. This segmentation allows the system to handle large datasets efficiently by processing different levels of detail simultaneously, improving scalability without overwhelming computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension to the labeling process, transitioning from flat conventional labeling to multi-level labeling with global and local models. This dimensional change enables the system to manage complexity by organizing processing tasks across different hierarchical levels, allowing scalable processing of large image datasets while maintaining systematic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If conventional labeling techniques are used, then the implementation is straightforward, but labeling accuracy is insufficient for complex images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the labeling task into global labeling (overall image context) and local labeling (specific object or region details). This segmentation enables the system to achieve high labeling accuracy by addressing different aspects of image interpretation at appropriate levels, without requiring a single overly complex model that would be difficult to implement and train.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by using local classification models that are specialized for specific regions, objects, or types of labels within the image. These local models can be optimized for their specific purposes while the global model handles overall context, allowing the system to achieve high accuracy across diverse image content without uniform complexity throughout the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of time

If a single global classification model is used, then the system is simple to manage, but training time is excessive for large datasets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining timeVSAvoidmodel architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training process into parallel global model training and local model training phases. This segmentation reduces overall training time by distributing computational work across multiple models that can train independently on different portions or aspects of the dataset, rather than requiring a single monolithic model to process everything sequentially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs partial action by training local classification models only for specific regions or object types rather than applying a single global model to every aspect of every image. This partial specialization reduces the computational burden on any single model and allows parallel processing, significantly reducing total training time while maintaining comprehensive coverage through the ensemble of models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10102443B1Hierarchical conditional random field model for labeling and segmenting images
Publication Date: 2018.10.16 GOOGLE LLC
  • US10102443B1 patent drawing
  • US10102443B1 patent drawing
  • US10102443B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing system automatically segments and labels an image using a hierarchical classification model. A global classification model determines initial labels for an image based on features of the image. A label-based descriptor is generated based on the initial labels. A local classification model is then selected from a plurality of learned local classification model based on the label-based descriptor. The local classification model is applied to the features of the input image to determined refined labels. The refined labels are stored in association with the input image.