Hierarchical Grid Response for DER Uncertainty and Real-Time Restoration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional distribution service restoration methods face challenges in managing the dynamics and uncertainties of distributed energy resources (DERs) for optimal scheduling and control, particularly in large-scale systems with high computational complexity, limiting their feasibility for real-time applications during extreme events like hurricanes or earthquakes.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcement learning-based collaborative resilience grid response framework is introduced, featuring a hierarchical management structure with flexible multi-agent placement for distribution system control entities, reducing model complexity through node cell segmentation and observational data construction to generate control actions for controllable components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional centralized model-based optimization methods are used for distribution service restoration, then system-wide coordination and optimal scheduling can be achieved, but computational complexity and computational burden increase significantly with system size, making real-time application infeasible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice restoration effectivenessVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the distribution system into multiple feeder systems and further segments each feeder into node cells (groups of nodes). This hierarchical segmentation allows the restoration problem to be solved in a distributed manner across multiple agents, reducing the computational burden on any single agent while maintaining system-wide coordination through inter-agent communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension to the restoration framework, with a high-level coordinator managing inter-feeder coordination and low-level agents handling local node cell restoration. This dimensional transformation from a flat centralized approach to a hierarchical distributed approach enables real-time decision-making by reducing the problem size at each level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If detailed system models are used for precise optimization in centralized model-based restoration, then accurate control can be achieved, but computational speed decreases and scalability is constrained by system size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem model precisionVSAvoidcomputational speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Each agent in the patent performs partial optimization for its local node cell rather than solving the complete system-wide optimization problem. The low-level agents focus on local restoration actions while the high-level coordinator handles global coordination, allowing parallel computation that significantly improves computational speed while maintaining sufficient precision for real-time application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of controllable devices and DERs are integrated into the distribution system, then system functionality and resilience are improved, but modeling complexity and computational burden increase greatly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidmodeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent groups multiple nodes into node cells and aggregates controllable devices within each cell. This merging reduces the number of individual elements that need to be modeled and controlled separately, simplifying the overall system model while preserving the functional capabilities of the integrated devices through coordinated control at the cell level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20240160801A1Collaborative resilient grid response framework considering der uncertainties and dynamics
Publication Date: 2024.05.16 HITACHI LTD
  • US20240160801A1 patent drawing
  • US20240160801A1 patent drawing
  • US20240160801A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods described herein can involve reducing a feeder system model by node cell segmentation on feeder system according to system topology information and system operation characteristics to generate a node cell segmented distribution grid; constructing observational data from systemwide status information aggregated from nodes identified from the node cell segmented distribution grid to meet a reinforcement learning (RL) policy network input requirement; training an RL policy framework to generate control actions for controllable components of the system; and executing the RL policy framework to generate control actions for controllable nodes in the node cell segmented distribution grid.