Hierarchical Mission Planning for Large Multi-Agent Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mission management systems are inefficient due to high computational expense with large agent populations, incomplete information about mission environments, and inability to autonomously coordinate multiple agents executing heterogeneous operations, leading to resource misallocation and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A hierarchical mission management system that assigns mission specifications to multiple levels of agent groups, using a hierarchy specification to allocate tasks and resources, with a communication system to facilitate coordination between mission planners and agents, allowing for dynamic re-planning and resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If a single system is used to manage missions with large agent populations, then complete information about task requirements can be obtained, but computational expense increases proportionately with agent population size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidcomputational expense
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the mission management system into a hierarchical structure with multiple levels (e.g., Level 1, Level 2, Level 3 mission planners). Each level manages a subset of agents and tasks, segmenting the overall computational problem into smaller, more manageable sub-problems. This segmentation reduces the computational expense at each level while collectively maintaining comprehensive task requirement information across the entire hierarchy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If resource allocation is optimized by searching entire agent population, then task requirements can be matched accurately, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask-agent matching accuracyVSAvoidallocation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The hierarchical structure segments the agent population into multiple levels, where each level performs resource allocation for its specific subset. This eliminates the need to search the entire agent population simultaneously, reducing allocation time while maintaining matching accuracy through coordinated decision-making across hierarchical levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Higher levels in the hierarchy perform preliminary task analysis and requirements definition before lower levels execute detailed agent allocation. This preliminary action at upper levels prepares task specifications in advance, enabling lower levels to quickly match agents to tasks without performing exhaustive searches, thus reducing overall allocation time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If manual inspection and maintenance methods are used, then flexible operation can be achieved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidoperation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal hierarchical mission management system that can handle multiple types of operations (inspection, maintenance, monitoring) through a single framework. This multi-functional system replaces the need for separate customized manual methods for each operation type, reducing costs while maintaining operational flexibility through adaptive task allocation and agent assignment capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Extent of automation

If semi-autonomous systems are deployed for specific operations, then automation level increases, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple semi-autonomous systems into a single hierarchical mission management framework. Instead of having separate complex systems for different operations, the hierarchical structure integrates them all, reducing overall system complexity. The standardized interface and unified resource allocation mechanism simplify the system architecture while maintaining high automation levels across all operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11720832B2Hierarchical mission management
Publication Date: 2023.08.08 THE BOEING CO
  • US11720832B2 patent drawing
  • US11720832B2 patent drawing
  • US11720832B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The different advantageous embodiments further provide a system for hierarchical mission management comprising a number of mission planners, a data processing system, and a communication system. The number of mission planners are associated with a number of agent groups. The data processing system is configured to execute the number of mission planners. The communication system is configured to provide communication between the number of mission planners.