Hierarchical Place Name Tags for Digital Map Clusters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital mapping systems fail to provide meaningful and concise location information for aggregated geolocation tags, leading to clutter and ambiguity when pinning large quantities of photographs on a map, especially when photographs are concentrated in small geographic areas.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a hierarchical place name tag system that converts geotag data into multilevel tags (e.g., country, state, city, street) to create consolidated pin labels that adapt to map zoom levels, providing users with intuitive and descriptive labels for clusters of photographs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If multiple photographs are pinned to a digital map, then the user can visualize photograph locations geographically, but the map becomes cluttered and ambiguous when photographs are concentrated in small geographic areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation information clarityVSAvoidmap clutter
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple geotagged photographs located near each other are merged into a single consolidated pin on the map. The system automatically detects clusters of photographs within a specified distance threshold and represents them as one unified pin, reducing visual clutter while preserving location information through hierarchical place name tags that display common geographic identifiers across all photographs in the cluster.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the map view into different zoom level ranges and applies different consolidation strategies for each segment. At closer zoom levels, photographs are kept more separate to show individual locations, while at broader zoom levels, more aggressive consolidation occurs. This segmentation allows the system to adapt the level of detail based on the user's current view scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If consolidated pins are used to reduce clutter, then the map becomes cleaner, but the user loses meaningful insight into the particular locations of aggregated photographs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemap clutterVSAvoidlocation specificity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

Hierarchical place name tags serve as an intermediary between the consolidated pin and the individual photograph locations. Instead of displaying all individual locations or none at all, the system extracts and displays common place name tags (such as city, state, country) that are shared across all photographs in the cluster. This intermediary representation provides meaningful location insight without requiring individual pins for each photograph.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different levels of location detail to different parts of the consolidated pin label based on the distribution of photograph locations. Common place names that appear across multiple photographs are displayed prominently, while unique or less common locations are either omitted or displayed with less prominence. This local quality approach ensures that the most relevant location information is always visible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If photographs are pinned with precise geolocation data, then accurate location tracking is achieved, but the user has difficulty identifying which pins represent photographs of interest when zooming in or out

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeolocation accuracyVSAvoidphotograph identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The consolidated pin labels are dynamic and automatically update based on the user's current zoom level and the set of photographs currently visible on the map. As the user zooms in or out, the system recalculates which photographs form clusters and updates the hierarchical place name tags accordingly. This dynamic behavior ensures that the most relevant location information is always displayed for the current view context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to the user by displaying hierarchical place name tags that reflect the actual distribution of photograph locations. When a user hovers over or clicks a consolidated pin, the system provides additional feedback by showing the number of photographs in the cluster and allowing selection of specific photographs. This feedback loop helps users quickly identify and navigate to photographs of interest.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10817546B2Labelling of aggregated geolocation tags in a digital mapping system
Publication Date: 2020.10.27 ADOBE INC
  • US10817546B2 patent drawing
  • US10817546B2 patent drawing
  • US10817546B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Geotag data embedded in a photograph is converted to a multilevel hierarchical place name tag, which is a new data structure. Higher hierarchy levels correspond to larger geographical regions. Lower hierarchy levels correspond to smaller geographical regions. The geotag data is used to locate the photograph on a map. A cluster of nearby photographs is defined and represented by a consolidated pin. The identification and quantity of clustered photographs depends on the relative locations of the photographs and the map zoom level. A consolidated pin label is defined based on which hierarchy levels, if any, have a common place name tags. In some cases the consolidated pin label includes only place name tags that are shared amongst all clustered photographs. In other cases the consolidated pin label includes a short list of mutually exclusive place name tags. The consolidated pin label is displayed on the map near the consolidated pin.