Hierarchical Power-Down Management for Scalable Multi-Node Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of efficiently managing power consumption in multi-node computing systems is complicated by the need to power down multiple power controllers, which becomes difficult to scale as the number of sockets increases, and routing multiple connections increases signal density and area requirements.

Innovation Solution

A hierarchical power management approach is implemented, where nodes are organized in a distributed or centralized topology, allowing for efficient negotiation of system-wide power down without powering down links first, thereby reducing power consumption and system costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If each power controller is connected to each other power controller in the system, then communicating when to power down the system becomes easier, but scaling the system becomes difficult and routing multiple connections increases signal density and area requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower down communicationVSAvoidsystem scaling
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a fabric-mediated communication approach where power controllers communicate through a shared fabric infrastructure rather than direct point-to-point connections. This intermediary fabric handles the coordination of power down operations across multiple sockets, eliminating the need for complex mesh networking while maintaining effective communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The fabric infrastructure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it handles power management communication, data transfer, and system coordination. This multi-functional approach allows the same communication backbone to manage power down operations without requiring dedicated signaling paths, thereby simplifying system scaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If each power controller is connected to each other power controller in the system, then communicating when to power down the system becomes easier, but routing multiple connections increases area for interfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower down communicationVSAvoidinterface area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges power management communication with the existing fabric infrastructure used for data transfer. By combining these communication functions into a single shared medium, the system eliminates the need for separate dedicated signaling paths between power controllers, thereby reducing the total interface area required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If cooling systems are utilized to remove excess heat, then IC failure is prevented, but system costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIC failure preventionVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service power management where each power controller independently monitors and manages its own power consumption and thermal conditions. This decentralized approach allows the system to maintain reliability by addressing thermal issues locally without requiring complex centralized cooling infrastructure, thereby reducing overall system cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12411538B2System-wide low power management
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
  • US12411538B2 patent drawing
  • US12411538B2 patent drawing
  • US12411538B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, and methods for performing efficient power management for a multi-node computing system are disclosed. A computing system includes multiple nodes. When power down negotiation is distributed, negotiation for system-wide power down occurs within a lower level of a node hierarchy prior to negotiation for power down occurring at a higher level of the node hierarchy. When power down negotiation is centralized, a given node combines a state of its clients with indications received on its downstream link and sends an indication on an upstream link based on the combining. Only a root node sends power down requests.