Hierarchical System Resource Optimization via Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hierarchical systems face limitations in scalability, management independency, and efficient resource allocation due to exponential cost increases in resource allocation optimization, difficulty in achieving optimal resource management balance, and recalculation inefficiencies across varying resource demands.

Innovation Solution

A hierarchical system with a tree structure where lower system structures report performance information to upper structures, enabling resource optimization processing based on performance and management information, and allowing independent optimization and resource allocation management while hiding detailed management information from outside systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If resource allocation optimization is performed in conventional hierarchical systems, then resource utilization efficiency is improved, but system complexity and computational cost increase exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the hierarchical system into multiple levels (upper system structure and lower system structures) with distinct responsibilities. Each level performs resource allocation optimization independently within its scope, breaking down the exponential complexity problem into manageable polynomial sub-problems. The upper structure manages high-level resource distribution while lower structures handle detailed local allocation, preventing any single component from bearing the full computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension to resource management, organizing systems into multiple levels rather than a flat structure. This dimensional transformation allows resource allocation to be approached from different levels of abstraction, where each level solves a simplified version of the optimization problem. The tree structure creates a multi-dimensional management framework that reduces overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive resource control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If detailed management information is shared across hierarchical levels, then resource optimization accuracy is improved, but information security and management independency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource optimization accuracyVSAvoidinformation security
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by allowing each hierarchical level to access and process only the management information necessary for its specific optimization tasks. The upper system structure receives aggregated performance information from lower structures without accessing detailed operational data, while lower structures maintain full visibility of their local resources. This differentiated information access pattern ensures both optimization accuracy at each level and security of sensitive detailed information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces performance information as an intermediary between upper and lower system structures. Instead of direct access to detailed management information, the upper structure receives processed performance metrics that capture essential system state without revealing sensitive operational details. This intermediary layer enables effective resource optimization at the upper level while protecting the confidentiality and security of detailed management information at lower levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If resource reallocation is performed frequently to meet varying demands, then system adaptability is improved, but computational overhead and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem adaptabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by establishing scheduled resource allocation optimization cycles at each hierarchical level. Instead of continuous reallocation in response to every demand change, the system performs optimization at predetermined intervals, allowing demands to be aggregated and processed in batches. This periodic approach maintains system adaptability by regularly adjusting resource allocation while significantly reducing computational overhead compared to continuous reallocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by having lower system structures report performance information to upper structures in advance of actual resource allocation decisions. This advance reporting allows the upper structure to pre-process and prepare optimization strategies before final allocation decisions are made. By performing preliminary analysis and preparation, the system reduces the time required for actual resource reallocation while maintaining high adaptability to changing demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8667488B2Hierarchical system, and its management method and program
Publication Date: 2014.03.04 NEC CORP
  • US8667488B2 patent drawing
  • US8667488B2 patent drawing
  • US8667488B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lower system structure reports performance information to an upper system structure. When detecting performance deterioration of the system structure on the basis of the reported performance information, the upper system structure optimizes resource redistribution of the system structure that the upper system structure manages. If the performance is improved by the optimization in the managed system structure, the optimization results is applied to the resource control of the lower system structure, and the lower system structure redistributes the resources according to the resource control. If the performance is not improved by the optimization, the lower system structure reports the performance information to the upper system structure, which optimizes the resource redistribution.