Hierarchical Tile-Based Rasterization for 3D Graphics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing equation-based rasterization algorithms lack optimization and specific hardware implementations, particularly for rasterizing polygons and lines in 3D Z-buffered graphics, and do not effectively utilize hardware for parallel processing.

Innovation Solution

A hierarchical tile-based rasterization algorithm that optimizes performance and locality by validating pixels in hierarchical rectangles or blocks in parallel, breaking them down into subtiles and quads, and rendering valid quads, with hardware implementation for improved memory utilization and throughput.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional edge-walking algorithms are used for rasterization, then the algorithm is simple to implement, but the rendering performance and throughput are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverendering performanceVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the rasterization process into hierarchical levels (super-supertiles, supertiles, tiles, quads) where each level processes smaller regions independently. This segmentation enables parallel processing across multiple hierarchy levels simultaneously, dramatically improving rendering throughput while maintaining manageable complexity through modular organization of the rendering pipeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension to the traditional 2D tile-based approach by creating multiple levels of abstraction (super-supertile → supertile → tile → quad). This dimensional extension allows parallel processing at each hierarchy level, transforming a single-threaded sequential approach into a multi-level parallel architecture that achieves high throughput without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If hierarchical tile-based validation is performed in parallel, then memory efficiency and throughput are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation process is segmented into four distinct hierarchical levels (super-supertiles, supertiles, tiles, quads), each with its own validation logic and processing units. This segmentation allows independent parallel validation at each level, improving throughput while keeping individual validation units relatively simple and modular.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a nested hierarchical structure where super-supertiles contain supertiles, which contain tiles, which contain quads. Each nested level performs validation on its contained regions, allowing parallel execution across the nesting hierarchy. This nested approach enables sophisticated parallel processing while reusing validation logic across multiple levels, managing hardware complexity through systematic reuse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Productivity

If equation-based rasterization is used, then the algorithm is general purpose, but it lacks optimization and specific hardware implementation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverendering speedVSAvoidimplementation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating and storing edge equations, minimum and maximum coordinates, and validity information at each hierarchical level before actual pixel rendering. This preliminary processing at super-supertile, supertile, and tile levels eliminates redundant calculations during pixel generation, dramatically improving rendering speed while organizing the complexity into manageable pre-processing and execution phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the general equation-based approach into an optimized implementation by changing parameters from processing individual pixels to processing hierarchical blocks (tiles and quads). It introduces parameters such as tile validity bits, quad coverage masks, and hierarchical coordinates that enable vectorized and parallel processing, achieving high rendering speed while maintaining systematic implementability through parameterized algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP1918878B1Hierarchical tile-based rasterization algorithm
Publication Date: 2018.12.12 VIVANTE CORP
  • EP1918878B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1918878B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1918878B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A hierarchical tile-based rasterization method is disclosed. The inventive rasterization algorithm rasterizes pixels in hierarchical rectangles or blocks. The method includes: walking a plurality of tiles of pixels and determining if each tile is valid; breaking each valid tile into a plurality of subtiles and determining if each subtile is valid; breaking each valid subtile into a plurality of quads and determining if each quad is valid; and rendering pixels for each valid quad. These hierarchical levels of block validations are performed in parallel. The inventive rasterization algorithm is further implemented in hardware for better performance.