High-Capacity Computer Modules with Multi-Slot Configurations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computer modules in existing systems are limited in capacity, resource utilization, and configurability, making them inadequate for demanding applications and difficult to install and remove, especially in densely populated computer systems.

Innovation Solution

The development of high-capacity computer modules with non-standard sizes, additional data paths, and proprietary card edges that allow for increased functionality and resource efficiency, along with advanced cooling systems and ejection mechanisms for easy insertion and removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If standard-sized modules are used, then compatibility with existing systems is maintained, but capacity and functionality are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecapacityVSAvoidmodule size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dimensionality change by transitioning from standard single-slot module dimensions to multi-slot configurations (2, 3, or 4 slots wide). This dimensional expansion provides additional board area and space for high-capacity components without fundamentally changing the module's basic form factor, thereby increasing capacity while maintaining reasonable system integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics through configurable module designs that can be adapted to different slot configurations (2, 3, or 4 slots). The modules are designed with flexible resource allocation capabilities, allowing the system to dynamically assign resources based on the specific module installed and its capacity requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional data paths and card edges are added to increase capacity, then functionality is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoidcard edge configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing card edges that can serve multiple functions. The additional card edges are not just for data transmission but also integrate power delivery, grounding, and control signals. This multi-functionality approach enhances capability while minimizing the increase in device complexity by consolidating multiple functions into unified interface structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements merging by combining multiple card edges into a unified module assembly. Rather than treating each card edge as a separate complex component, they are integrated into a single module unit with coordinated interfaces, reducing the overall complexity of managing multiple independent card edges while maintaining enhanced functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If modules are made larger to increase capacity, then more functionality is available, but ease of operation during insertion and removal decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecapacityVSAvoidinsertion and removal
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the module ejection function into distinct components: ejection tabs on the module, corresponding receptacles in the system housing, and spring-loaded ejection mechanisms. This segmentation allows the large high-capacity module to be ejected through localized interaction points rather than requiring manual manipulation of the entire module, thereby maintaining ease of operation despite increased module size

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements the intermediary principle by introducing ejection tabs as mediator elements between the user and the large module. These tabs provide convenient grip points and leverage mechanisms that facilitate the insertion and removal of oversized modules without requiring direct handling of the entire module body, thus preserving ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If high-capacity modules are installed in densely populated systems, then system capability is increased, but space availability for other components is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capabilityVSAvoidavailable space
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dimensionality change by utilizing the vertical dimension (multiple slots width) to accommodate high-capacity modules. Instead of expanding horizontally and displacing other components, the modules extend across multiple vertical slots, efficiently using the available vertical space in the system housing while maintaining adequate horizontal clearance for other components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12016123B2High-capacity computer modules
Publication Date: 2024.06.18 APPLE INC
  • US12016123B2 patent drawing
  • US12016123B2 patent drawing
  • US12016123B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer modules that can have a high-capacity, can simplify the design of a computer system housing the modules, can utilize system resources in a highly configurable manner, can provide a variety of functionality, and can be readily inserted into, and removed from, a computer system.