High delimber

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pole pruners face challenges in maneuverability, ergonomic use, and sawing performance due to the leverage effect of heavy chainsaws on long handles, leading to unnatural working positions and insufficient contact pressure, especially in dense trees.

Innovation Solution

A motor-driven propeller-assisted pole pruner with pivotably mounted propellers, allowing for intuitive handling and adjustable thrust to manage the pruning saw's weight and apply necessary downforce, combined with a multicopter configuration for enhanced maneuverability and control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If a long handle (5-20m) is used to reach overhanging branches, then the pruning saw can reach distant branches, but the leverage effect makes maneuvering difficult and requires unnatural working positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandle lengthVSAvoidmaneuverability
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies counterweight principle by using propellers to generate upward thrust that compensates for the weight of the pruning saw and handle. The propellers create an opposing force to gravity, making the system feel lighter and easier to maneuver despite the long handle length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces aerodynamic thrust in the vertical dimension to counteract gravitational force. By adding propellers that generate upward force, the system transforms the problem from purely mechanical leverage in horizontal plane to include vertical force compensation, effectively reducing the perceived weight and improving maneuverability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Force

If sufficient pressing force is applied to the branch via the long handle, then sawing performance improves, but the user is forced into unnatural working positions harmful to the body

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressing force on branchVSAvoidworking position
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The propellers generate upward thrust that counteracts the downward force needed to press the saw against the branch. This reduces the muscular effort required from the user and allows maintaining natural body posture while still applying sufficient cutting force through the combined effect of propeller thrust and user input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces pure mechanical force application (user pushing down on long handle) with aerodynamic force generation (propellers creating downward thrust). This substitution allows force application without requiring the user to contort their body into unnatural positions, as the propellers provide the primary forcing mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Force

If the ground exerts sufficient contact pressure, then sawing performance is adequate, but in dense trees the ground cannot exert sufficient contact pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact pressureVSAvoidperformance in dense trees
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The propellers generate additional downward force that compensates for insufficient ground reaction force in dense tree situations. By creating aerodynamic downforce, the system can maintain adequate contact pressure between the saw and branch even when the user's body weight and ground contact are insufficient, thereby improving performance in difficult pruning conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The propellers are activated before and during the cutting operation to pre-establish the necessary downward force on the branch. This preliminary application of aerodynamic force ensures that when the saw engages the branch, sufficient contact pressure is already present, eliminating the need to rely solely on ground contact pressure which may be inadequate in dense trees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables easier and safer operation with improved ergonomic posture, increased sawing performance, and reduced user effort, allowing for effective pruning in difficult branch situations without the need for unnatural positions or excessive force.

Implementation Method 1

at least one motor-driven propeller, which is mounted on the pruning saw or the handle... the propeller can both contribute upward holding force to hold the pruning saw's weight, making it 'weightless' maneuverable

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

exert additional downforce on the pruning saw... exerts additional downforce on the pruning saw. This makes operation of the pole pruner easier, allows for a more ergonomic working position and overall better sawing results are achieved

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDownforce: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentEP3354127B1High delimber
Publication Date: 2020.03.04 RIEGL LASER MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS
  • EP3354127B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3354127B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3354127B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

High-reach pruner (1) comprising a motor-driven branch saw (2) on a handle (3), with at least one motor-driven propeller (4) which is mounted on the branch saw (2) or the handle (3).