High-Density Nutritional Composition with Plant Polyphenols

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing nutritional compositions contain high amounts of fillers and empty calories, leading to low nutrient density and nutritional deficiencies, with most commercial products providing less than 20% of their calories from nutrients.

Innovation Solution

A high-density nutritional composition with a ratio of nutrients to fillers of at least 1.5:1, incorporating plant-derived nutrients such as proteins, fiber, vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants, while minimizing fillers and empty calories, and optionally enhanced with antioxidant boosters for additional health benefits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If existing nutritional compositions use fillers and empty calories to increase volume, then caloric intake is increased, but nutrient density decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecaloric intakeVSAvoidnutrient density
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of nutritional composition by establishing a minimum ratio of 1.5:1 between nutrients and fillers, fundamentally altering how nutritional compositions are formulated to ensure high nutrient density while maintaining acceptable caloric intake

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite nutritional composition that integrates multiple nutrient types (proteins, polyphenols, fiber, vitamins, minerals) in specific ratios with minimal fillers, forming a synergistic mixture that provides both nutrition and functional health benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If existing nutritional compositions contain high amounts of fillers, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but nutritional quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidnutritional quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes a minimum nutrient-to-filler ratio of 1.5:1 as a fundamental formulation parameter, which balances manufacturing feasibility with nutritional quality requirements, ensuring that products meet both cost constraints and nutritional standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If existing nutritional compositions provide less than 20% calories from nutrients, then formulation simplicity is maintained, but nutritional adequacy is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformulation simplicityVSAvoidnutritional adequacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the caloric composition parameter by requiring at least 60% of calories to come from nutrients (proteins, polyphenols, fiber, vitamins, minerals), which ensures nutritional adequacy while the standardized ratio framework maintains formulation simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250249069A1High-Density Nutritional Composition with Plant Polyphenols
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 GOODE HEALTH LLC

AI summary

A high-density nutritional composition is described comprising nutrients (protein, polyphenol, fiber, vitamins and mineral) and fillers, in a ratio of nutrients to fillers of at least 1.5:1. A nutritional combination is also described, where the nutritional composition can also be combined with one or more antioxidant and micronutrient boosters, to provide additional nutrients and health benefits, such as improving an individual's vascular health (e.g., blood circulation, blood vessel flexibility, cholesterol levels, and blood pressure), inflammation, immunity, cognitive function or reducing aging.