High-Drug-Load Coatable Cores With External Lubrication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing delayed release formulations face challenges with high drug load, low friability, high friability, slow disintegration, and inadequate lubrication leading to tablet ejection issues, particularly for drugs like 5-ASA, necessitating multiple tablets for daily dosing.

Innovation Solution

A method involving granulation, blending with a disintegrant, and external lubrication to produce a coatable core with a high drug load of at least 70 wt%, using a compression process that includes a film-forming enteric polymer coating for targeted intestinal release.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a high drug load of at least 70 wt% is achieved in the coatable core, then the dosing frequency is reduced and patient compliance is improved, but the friability of the tablet increases and manufacturing precision becomes more difficult to control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrug loadVSAvoidfriability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the compression force and lubricant concentration to achieve the desired balance between high drug load and acceptable friability. By adjusting these parameters during the compression process, the formulation maintains both high drug content and sufficient mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an intermediary lubricant system that mediates between the high drug load requirement and the friability constraint. The lubricant acts as a mediator during compression, enabling high drug load while controlling tablet friability through optimized lubricant selection and application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If external lubrication is used during compression to reduce friability, then the tablet ejection issues are resolved and manufacturing precision is improved, but the device complexity increases and production time is extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetablet ejectionVSAvoidcompression process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-coating the compression blend with lubricant before compression. This preliminary lubrication step prevents tablet ejection issues and reduces friability during the subsequent compression process, eliminating the need for complex in-process adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical lubrication systems with a simpler pre-coating approach. Instead of using complex in-process lubrication mechanisms during compression, the formulation uses a pre-applied lubricant layer that achieves the same protective effect with reduced device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Speed

If the compression process is optimized for high drug load, then the disintegration time is reduced and drug release is accelerated, but the hardness of the tablet decreases and manufacturing precision becomes more difficult to control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisintegration timeVSAvoidtablet hardness
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing compression force and lubricant concentration to achieve the desired balance between rapid disintegration and sufficient hardness. By adjusting these parameters, the formulation maintains both fast drug release and adequate mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite material principles by combining the drug substance with optimized excipients and lubricants in specific ratios. This composite formulation enables rapid disintegration while maintaining sufficient hardness through the synergistic interaction of multiple materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method produces cores with low friability, high hardness, rapid disintegration, and fast drug release, reducing dosing frequency and improving patient compliance by maintaining drug integrity and efficacy.

Implementation Method 1

A commonly used coating is one containing ionizable carboxylic groups. At higher pH levels, the carboxylic groups ionize, allowing the polymer coatings to disintegrate or dissolve.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectpH-dependent ionization: Ionisation

Data Source

PatentUS20250302755A1Coatable core for a modified release drug formulation
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 TILLOTS PHARMA AG
  • US20250302755A1 patent drawing
  • US20250302755A1 patent drawing
  • US20250302755A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method produces a coatable core for a modified release drug formulation for oral administration. The coatable core has a high drug load of at least 70 wt % based on the total weight of the coatable core. The method involves the steps of granulating a composition containing a drug and at least one binder to form granules; blending the granules with a pharmacologically acceptable disintegrant and optionally, one or more additional pharmacologically acceptable excipients, to form a compression blend, wherein the disintegrant is present in an amount from about 0.5 wt % to about 5 wt %, based on the total weight of the coatable core; and compressing the compression blend using an external lubrication compression method to form a coatable core.