Aircraft High-Lift Actuation System with Segmented Drive Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current high-lift actuation systems for aircraft are complex and heavy, requiring significant drive power and mechanical components, which hinders independent actuation of outboard and inboard devices, leading to increased weight, noise, and installation costs, while also limiting flexibility in variable camber systems.

Innovation Solution

A high-lift actuation system with independent drive devices for each high-lift surface, featuring local power drive units with interconnecting drivelines and a controller for synchronized or differential motion, eliminating the need for complex differential gearboxes and allowing for separate actuation of inboard and outboard surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a central drive unit with shared transmission shaft system is used to actuate high-lift surfaces, then synchronous deployment of all high-lift surfaces is assured, but system complexity and weight increase due to differential gearboxes, transmission shaft sections, joints, and bearings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronous deploymentVSAvoidtransmission shaft system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the high-lift surface actuation system into separate inboard and outboard segments, each with independent drive units. This segmentation eliminates the need for a complex shared transmission shaft system while allowing independent control of each segment, thereby reducing system complexity and weight while maintaining the ability to achieve synchronous deployment when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical differential gearbox and transmission shaft system with an electronically controlled system. Each drive unit has its own motor and control system, allowing synchronous operation to be achieved through electronic coordination rather than mechanical coupling, significantly reducing the number of mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Power

If a central drive unit is positioned in the fuselage region, then drive power can be transmitted to both wings, but significant drive power and noise are required, and cabin noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive power transmissionVSAvoidcabin noise
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the drive power system by placing drive units locally at each wing rather than centralizing them in the fuselage. This distribution of drive units eliminates the need for power transmission through the fuselage region and reduces noise generation in the cabin area, as each drive unit operates independently away from the cabin.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If differential gearboxes are used to enable independent outboard device actuation, then variable camber capability is achieved, but system complexity and weight increase due to additional mechanical components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariable camber capabilityVSAvoiddifferential gearbox architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical differential gearbox architecture with an electronically controlled system. Each drive unit has independent motor control that can be programmed to achieve variable camber configurations without requiring additional mechanical components. The electronic control system provides the same adaptability as mechanical differentials but with significantly reduced complexity and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If individual drive units with dual motor speed summing arrangement are used, then independent surface actuation is achieved, but system weight increases due to dedicated motor brakes and differential gearboxes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent surface actuationVSAvoiddrive unit weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the heavy components of motor brakes and differential gearboxes from the drive unit architecture. By using a simplified independent drive unit design with electronic control, the system achieves independent surface actuation without the weight penalty of these mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical speed summing arrangement and differential gearboxes with electronic control systems that coordinate multiple motors. This substitution eliminates the need for heavy mechanical components while maintaining the ability to independently actuate surfaces and provide redundant control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3653493B1High-lift actuation system having centralized inboard actuation control and independent outboard actuation control
Publication Date: 2023.01.18 BOMBARDIER INC
  • EP3653493B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3653493B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3653493B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A high-lift actuation system for actuating a plurality of high-lift surfaces of an aircraft is disclosed. An exemplary high-lift actuation system includes a centralized drive device for centralized actuation control of an inboard high-lift surface of a first wing and a second wing, respectively, and at least two independent drive devices for individual actuation control of an outboard high-lift surface of the first wing and the second wing, respectively. The centralized drive device may include a central power drive unit (PDU) operably coupled to a common central driveline for driving the inboard high-lift surfaces, and the common central driveline may be separate and spaced apart from a respective driveline of the independent drive devices. The common central driveline may mechanically synchronize movement of the inboard high-lift surfaces, and a controller may electronically coordinate synchronized movement and controlled differential movement of the plurality of high-lift surfaces.