3D Forming High Melting Polymers with Thermal Reservoirs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Three-dimensional printing of high melting temperature polymers faces challenges such as material strength limitations, high temperature damage to printing systems, and thermal stress issues, which hinder the production of parts with mechanical strength comparable to metal components, and the process is often cost-inefficient due to the need for complex mold development and high-energy input.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a spreader to form layers of high melting temperature polymer particles, a fluid ejection head to selectively deposit fusing agents, and a heat source to control temperature gradients, allowing for the formation of consolidated parts with heat reservoirs to maintain thermal stability and reduce warping, using a bed heater to maintain a temperature close to but below the polymer's melting point, and a radiation source for rapid layer formation and heating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If high melting temperature polymers are used for 3D printing to achieve mechanical strength comparable to metal parts, then the mechanical strength and toughness of the printed parts are improved, but the high temperature damages the printing system components and increases energy consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidhigh temperature damage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The printing system is segmented into distinct thermal zones: a heated build platform maintaining polymer melt temperature, and a cool printing head that deposits material. This spatial segmentation allows the polymer to be heated to high temperatures only where needed for consolidation, protecting the printing head from thermal damage while enabling use of high melting temperature polymers for strong parts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A fusing agent is introduced as an intermediary substance that mediates between the cool printing head and the hot polymer particles. The fusing agent is deposited first, then the polymer particles are heated and fused onto this intermediate layer, allowing thermal processing without direct exposure of the printing head to high temperatures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If complex mold development is used for traditional polymer molding to achieve high production volume and tight tolerances, then the manufacturing precision and productivity are improved, but the device complexity and development time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetight tolerancesVSAvoidmold development
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical mold system is replaced with a digital printing system that uses computer-controlled deposition and consolidation of polymer particles. This substitution eliminates the need for complex physical mold development while achieving comparable or superior precision through digital modeling and automated layer-by-layer construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing approach transitions from bulk molding with fixed mold geometry to layer-by-layer construction with controllable deposition parameters. By changing from a single-step molding process to multi-step digital fabrication with adjustable parameters (layer thickness, deposition rate, heating profile), the system achieves tight tolerances without complex mold development

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If high energy input is applied to melt and consolidate high melting temperature polymers, then the mechanical strength of the parts is improved, but the energy consumption and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Heating is applied locally only to the region where polymer consolidation is needed, rather than heating the entire printing system or all deposited material uniformly. The build platform and specific consolidation zones are heated to melt temperature, while other areas remain at lower temperatures, significantly reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining sufficient heat for strong part formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The heating and consolidation process occurs periodically in a controlled cycle: material is deposited, then heated and consolidated, then the cycle repeats for the next layer. This periodic action allows efficient heat utilization and reduces total energy consumption compared to continuous high-temperature processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Productivity

If rapid cooling is applied after polymer consolidation to improve production speed, then the productivity is improved, but thermal stress and warping increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidthermal stress
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Heat reservoirs are created in advance within the printed part structure before final cooling occurs. These pre-positioned heat reservoirs store thermal energy and provide gradual heat release during cooling, preventing rapid temperature gradients that would cause thermal stress and warping, while still enabling efficient production cycles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of 3D printed parts with enhanced mechanical strength and toughness, reduces material costs by using lower-cost system components, and improves throughput and reproducibility, making high melting temperature polymer parts more competitive with traditional metal parts.

Implementation Method 1

a radiation source to selectively heat the top layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadiation heating: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 2

using a bed heater to maintain a temperature close to but below the polymer's melting point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConductive heating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

a heat source to control temperature gradients, allowing for the formation of consolidated parts with heat reservoirs to maintain thermal stability and reduce warping

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal gradient control: Temperature Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11904537B23D forming objects using high melting temperature polymers
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 PERIDOT PRINT LLC
  • US11904537B2 patent drawing
  • US11904537B2 patent drawing
  • US11904537B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for forming a multiple layer object, the system including: a spreader to form a layer of polymer particles, the polymer particles having a melting temperature (Tm) of at least 250° C.; a fluid ejection head to selectively deposit a first fusing agent on a first portion of the layer and selectively deposit a second fusing agent on a second portion of the layer, wherein the fluid ejection head does not deposit the fusing agent on a third portion of the layer; and a heat source to heat the first portion and second portion, wherein the first portion is part of the multiple layer object and the second portion is not part of the multiple layer object and the second portion raises a temperature of polymer particles in a subsequent layer.