High-Pressure Amott Cell for Shale Oil Imbibition Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for evaluating spontaneous hydraulic fracturing fluid imbibition and oil displacement in unconventional shale oil and gas resource rocks are inadequate, as they fail to simulate the high pressure forces experienced during hydraulic fracturing, leading to inaccurate results and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A composite core made from drill cuttings is used within a pressure cell capable of withstanding up to 10,000 PSI, along with a high-pressure generator and a roller oven for simulating hydraulic fracturing conditions, allowing for rapid and accurate evaluation of fracturing fluid interactions with shale rocks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional Amott cell apparatus is used for imbibition testing, then the test can be performed with simple equipment, but the test cannot simulate high pressure forces (250-5000 PSI) experienced during hydraulic fracturing, leading to inaccurate results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of imbibition testingVSAvoidpressure cell complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the pressure cell to accommodate high pressure forces (250-5000 PSI) ranging from conventional testing limits. The pressure cell is designed with a pressure range of 0-10,000 PSI, enabling it to simulate actual hydraulic fracturing conditions rather than limited to 30 PSI, thereby improving testing accuracy and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by creating a composite core from drill cuttings mixed with bonding agents and additives. This composite core structure allows the test to accurately represent unconventional shale oil and gas resource rocks while withstanding the high pressure forces required to simulate real hydraulic fracturing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If conventional Amott cell testing is used, then the test procedure is simple, but it takes months for fluid imbibition to occur, making it inefficient for evaluating multiple fluid combinations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting throughputVSAvoidimbibition test duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by significantly increasing the pressure parameter from conventional 30 PSI limits to 250-5000 PSI range. This pressure acceleration causes rapid fluid imbibition into the composite core, reducing test duration from months to just 3 days, thereby enabling efficient evaluation of hundreds to thousands of fluid combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action through automated pressure cycling and data collection systems that continuously monitor imbibition processes. This allows systematic evaluation of multiple fluid combinations in rapid succession, improving testing throughput while maintaining accurate measurement of fluid-rock interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If atmospheric pressure testing is used, then equipment requirements are minimal, but it cannot account for fines migration and fouling of pore spaces that occur under high pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of oil displacement measurementVSAvoidpressure cell requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from atmospheric pressure to high pressure conditions (250-5000 PSI). This enables the test to accurately capture fines migration and pore space fouling phenomena that only occur under hydraulic fracturing pressure conditions, significantly improving the reliability of oil displacement measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating a composite core that replicates the physical and chemical properties of unconventional shale oil and gas resource rocks. This composite core, made from drill cuttings with bonding agents, serves as an accurate model that can be tested under high pressure to predict actual reservoir behavior without requiring access to real formation cores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If high pressure testing up to 10,000 PSI is implemented, then accurate simulation of hydraulic fracturing conditions is achieved, but the pressure cell requires specialized materials and construction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation accuracyVSAvoidpressure cell manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by designing the pressure cell with a pressure range of 0-10,000 PSI, enabling accurate simulation of hydraulic fracturing conditions. The pressure cell incorporates specialized materials and construction techniques to withstand these extreme pressures while maintaining structural integrity and measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials in the pressure cell construction, combining materials with different mechanical properties to achieve both high pressure resistance and measurement precision. This allows the pressure cell to accurately simulate hydraulic fracturing conditions while remaining manufacturable through the use of composite material structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables fast and reliable testing of fracturing fluids, reducing imbibition time from months to just 3 days, and allows for evaluation of fluid breakdown properties under formation temperature conditions, significantly improving the accuracy and efficiency of fluid selection for hydraulic fracturing.

Implementation Method 1

The prior art cells are limited to 30 PSI pressure, which is very close to the maximum pressure that glass can withstand. Unconventional shale oil and gas resource rock wells have imbibition pressure forces that can be in the range of 250 PSI to 5000 PSI greater than the confining pressure.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure forces: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

measuring the ability of a holistic fracturing fluid and/or individual components to interact with unconventional shale oil and gas resource rocks to improve upon the wettability and subsequent fluid imbibition and oil displacement mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImbibition: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 3

placing the cells into a roller oven custom designed to the pressure cell size for heating to evaluate under formation temperature conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS12326435B1Evaluating spontaneous hydraulic fracturing fluid imbibition and oil displacement method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.06.10 IMPERATIVE CHEMICAL PARTNERS INC
  • US12326435B1 patent drawing
  • US12326435B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A test for evaluating spontaneous hydraulic fracturing fluid imbibition and oil displacement method and apparatus utilizing a composite core with a pressurized Amott cell test.