High-Pressure Heat Exchanger Manifold With Variable Thickness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-pressure fluids in heat exchangers with flat tubes pose a challenge due to the need for increased mechanical resistance, as the distance between slots in the manifold becomes too small, compromising structural integrity under high pressure conditions.

Innovation Solution

A high-pressure heat exchanger design featuring a manifold with variable thickness, including a header with locally thinner areas around slots, and internal plates to create robust flow paths, allowing for greater tube density and improved mechanical resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the number of tubes is increased to improve heat exchange efficiency, then the heat exchange performance is improved, but the distance between consecutive slots in the manifold decreases, compromising mechanical resistance under high pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange efficiencyVSAvoidmanifold mechanical resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The manifold header employs variable thickness design where the first area adjacent to slots has a first thickness w1 and the second area surrounding it has a second thickness w2 greater than w1. This local quality differentiation provides mechanical strength where needed (in areas away from slots) while maintaining slot accessibility for tubes, resolving the contradiction between tube density and structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The manifold is divided into distinct functional areas: a first area adjacent to slots for tube insertion, and a second area surrounding it with greater thickness for structural reinforcement. This segmentation allows each zone to optimize its properties independently - the first area facilitates tube placement while the second area provides the necessary mechanical resistance under high pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If the manifold thickness is increased to improve mechanical resistance, then the structural integrity is improved, but the complexity of manufacturing and material usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanifold mechanical resistanceVSAvoidmanifold structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than uniformly increasing the entire manifold thickness, the invention applies greater thickness only to the second area surrounding the first area, creating a localized reinforcement zone. This approach improves mechanical resistance where needed while avoiding unnecessary material usage and manufacturing complexity throughout the entire component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The manifold design incorporates variable thickness parameters - a first thickness w1 in the area adjacent to slots and a second thickness w2 in the surrounding area. This parameter change allows optimization of mechanical properties in specific zones without proportionally increasing overall component complexity or material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If the distance between slots is decreased to accommodate more tubes, then the tube density and heat exchange surface area are increased, but the mechanical resistance of the manifold under high pressure is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of tubesVSAvoidmanifold mechanical resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The manifold header is segmented into a first area adjacent to slots with smaller thickness w1, allowing close spacing of slots for high tube density, and a second area surrounding it with greater thickness w2, providing structural reinforcement. This segmentation enables both high tube quantity and adequate mechanical resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution moves from a two-dimensional planar view to a three-dimensional variable thickness structure. By adding the thickness dimension with different values (w1 and w2) in different zones, the design accommodates both high slot density and sufficient mechanical strength, effectively resolving the contradiction in a higher dimensional space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP3907459B1A heat exchanger
Publication Date: 2025.10.29 VALEO AUTOSYSTY
  • EP3907459B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3907459B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3907459B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A high pressure heat exchanger (100) comprising a first manifold (101) and a second manifold connected fluidly by a plurality of tube sets (20) arranged in a spaced manner along the manifolds, wherein at least one of the manifold comprises a rear cover (102), a header (103) with slots (104) receiving tube end sections (11b) of the tube sets and several internal plates (105) interposed between the header and the rear cover and configured to create a flow path within the manifold, this flow path being in fluid connection with the tubes to allow a circulation of a refrigerant in the tubes and the manifold, and wherein the header (103) has preferably at least a first area (110) adjacent to at least one of the slots and having a first thickness w1 and at least a second area (111) surrounding at least partially the first area and having a second thickness w2, first thickness w1 being smaller than second thickness w2.